Atlas of Australian Birds was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article will be put on hold (for 7 days) until these minor adjustments can be made :
Additional comments :
The article sounds good and is well written, I was just wondering if it was broad enough and in such, I have placed questions here that one should answer to let me know how much that can be added in the article. For that time period, the article will be on hold. Good luck, Lincher 15:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
I think it would be neat if this article showed one of the maps (there's a good fair use argumnet for using one) since the way they have collected and presented the data is (at least as far as I'm aware) pretty unique. -- Peta 04:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
I have changed the lead section so it would be in accordance with WP:LEAD in summarizing the article to come and not providing original material. Please feel free to copyedit it and modify it until it meets your view of what a lead should be like. You can revert it back to the one you created but that one didn't meet the requirements requested by GA. Lincher 15:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Resquested comments have been taken into consideration and I now consider the article GA for it meets the GA requirements. Nice work, Lincher 11:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
This page should not have been moved to a title which includes the definite article. It is primarily about an ongoing database project which happens to have produced two books in the course of its activities. The books have been published and are rightfully included in the asrticle as part of it, but the project continues and is larger and more significant than the books. Maias ( talk) 23:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I think that this article needs some maintenance if it is to remain a GA and avoid a GAR. I have listed some possible problems for discussion. I think that this article does not satisfy several GA criteria: Snowman ( talk) 14:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Atlas of Australian Birds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Atlas of Australian Birds was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article will be put on hold (for 7 days) until these minor adjustments can be made :
Additional comments :
The article sounds good and is well written, I was just wondering if it was broad enough and in such, I have placed questions here that one should answer to let me know how much that can be added in the article. For that time period, the article will be on hold. Good luck, Lincher 15:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
I think it would be neat if this article showed one of the maps (there's a good fair use argumnet for using one) since the way they have collected and presented the data is (at least as far as I'm aware) pretty unique. -- Peta 04:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
I have changed the lead section so it would be in accordance with WP:LEAD in summarizing the article to come and not providing original material. Please feel free to copyedit it and modify it until it meets your view of what a lead should be like. You can revert it back to the one you created but that one didn't meet the requirements requested by GA. Lincher 15:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Resquested comments have been taken into consideration and I now consider the article GA for it meets the GA requirements. Nice work, Lincher 11:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
This page should not have been moved to a title which includes the definite article. It is primarily about an ongoing database project which happens to have produced two books in the course of its activities. The books have been published and are rightfully included in the asrticle as part of it, but the project continues and is larger and more significant than the books. Maias ( talk) 23:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
I think that this article needs some maintenance if it is to remain a GA and avoid a GAR. I have listed some possible problems for discussion. I think that this article does not satisfy several GA criteria: Snowman ( talk) 14:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Atlas of Australian Birds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)