This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think that Andrevan's edit was harmful. Truly. That's why I assumed good faith.
However, I do think that I don't know why it was changed. That's what the edit summary is for. The edit can simply be redone and a short note on who, what, and why should be included. E_dog95' Hi ' 18:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Removed reference to Raytheon and University of Arizona because Astrobotic has not been affiliated with them for a couple years. Updated description with current affiliations to come. Authenticus ( talk) 17:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
More press I haven't yet had time to read. May be helpful for improving the article.
Cheers. N2e ( talk) 14:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
There are a number of details on the design and current manufacturing status of the lander in the slide show text that accompanies the Wall Street Journal article of 2 July 2011. I added a citation to the WSJ source to the main AT article yesterday. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 13:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
This press release gives the date for the mission as late October 2015, 2 1/2 years from now, with launch on a SpaceX Falcon 9. Landing location is planned for the lunar north pole: the mission "will prospect for potentially rich deposits of water ice, methane and other resources at the moon’s north pole." Cheers. N2e ( talk) 03:14, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Astrobotic Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you fellow editors for documenting that Wikipedia went to the Moon. Geraldshields11 ( talk) 12:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
the company is touting this solution and plans to deploy it as a payload in 2026. should be added as a section in the article if its a product they offer https://www.astrobotic.com/lunar-delivery/lunar-surface-power/ 73.210.30.217 ( talk) 06:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think that Andrevan's edit was harmful. Truly. That's why I assumed good faith.
However, I do think that I don't know why it was changed. That's what the edit summary is for. The edit can simply be redone and a short note on who, what, and why should be included. E_dog95' Hi ' 18:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Removed reference to Raytheon and University of Arizona because Astrobotic has not been affiliated with them for a couple years. Updated description with current affiliations to come. Authenticus ( talk) 17:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
More press I haven't yet had time to read. May be helpful for improving the article.
Cheers. N2e ( talk) 14:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
There are a number of details on the design and current manufacturing status of the lander in the slide show text that accompanies the Wall Street Journal article of 2 July 2011. I added a citation to the WSJ source to the main AT article yesterday. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 13:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
This press release gives the date for the mission as late October 2015, 2 1/2 years from now, with launch on a SpaceX Falcon 9. Landing location is planned for the lunar north pole: the mission "will prospect for potentially rich deposits of water ice, methane and other resources at the moon’s north pole." Cheers. N2e ( talk) 03:14, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Astrobotic Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you fellow editors for documenting that Wikipedia went to the Moon. Geraldshields11 ( talk) 12:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
the company is touting this solution and plans to deploy it as a payload in 2026. should be added as a section in the article if its a product they offer https://www.astrobotic.com/lunar-delivery/lunar-surface-power/ 73.210.30.217 ( talk) 06:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)