![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Assembly of First Nations appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 March 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
This article is lacking detail on the AFN. For example, what is the core area(s) of activity, what accomplishments have been achieved, what are the greatest remaining challenges...? This article does not help me understand this organization. Can someone knwoledgeable assist? Thanks, Hu Gadarn 21:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
The talk of the AFN being "obsequious" is not very NPV, and that whole paragraph needs appropriate citations. Feels like an edit by someone in the Nepinak camp; not without merit but needs context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSix ( talk • contribs) 06:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Assembly of First Nations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3683/is_199904/ai_n8843392/pg_9When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Should there be a section on criticism. See e.g. [1], [2]. Sancho 20:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Assembly of First Nations appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 March 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
This article is lacking detail on the AFN. For example, what is the core area(s) of activity, what accomplishments have been achieved, what are the greatest remaining challenges...? This article does not help me understand this organization. Can someone knwoledgeable assist? Thanks, Hu Gadarn 21:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
The talk of the AFN being "obsequious" is not very NPV, and that whole paragraph needs appropriate citations. Feels like an edit by someone in the Nepinak camp; not without merit but needs context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSix ( talk • contribs) 06:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Assembly of First Nations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3683/is_199904/ai_n8843392/pg_9When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Should there be a section on criticism. See e.g. [1], [2]. Sancho 20:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)