![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Assault weapon Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Assault weapon |
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
{{
cite book}}
: |edition=
has extra text (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) - Hawaii{{
cite book}}
: |edition=
has extra text (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) - Maryland-- Lightbreather ( talk) 21:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Lightbreather, please justify your use of misleading links to articles that do not exist. There are other articles available to provide examples of assault pistols. -- Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 05:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Shouldn't that whole section be deleted? We already have wikilinks to examples in the section above it. At the very least we need to clarify 'where' these particular firearms are defined as assault pistols. Part of the issue is that the term is so hard to pin down - by putting "examples" in the encyclopedia's voice, we're misleading the reader. Faceless Enemy ( talk) 12:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Assault weapon Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Assault weapon |
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
{{
cite book}}
: |edition=
has extra text (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) - Hawaii{{
cite book}}
: |edition=
has extra text (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) - Maryland-- Lightbreather ( talk) 21:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Lightbreather, please justify your use of misleading links to articles that do not exist. There are other articles available to provide examples of assault pistols. -- Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 05:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Shouldn't that whole section be deleted? We already have wikilinks to examples in the section above it. At the very least we need to clarify 'where' these particular firearms are defined as assault pistols. Part of the issue is that the term is so hard to pin down - by putting "examples" in the encyclopedia's voice, we're misleading the reader. Faceless Enemy ( talk) 12:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)