This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Asociación Mexicana de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Mexican association of Producers of Phonograms and Videograms was copied or moved into Asociación Mexicana de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas with this edit on 17:48, 22 May 2012 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
I would like to rework the "Album" portion of the Sales certificates table, because we've currently got a weird mish-mash of "Since" and "Until" across five rows of the section, and it's hard (for me, at least) to determine what thresholds applied when. I would like to replace the current notes with clearer phrases including "From" and "until". So first of all, I'd like to hear what others think of this idea, which would look like this:
Format | Thresholds [1] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Gold | Platinum | Diamond | Notes | |
Album | 40,000 | 80,000 | 400,000 | Since January 1, 2008 |
50,000 | 100,000 | 500,000 | From July 1, 2003, until December 31, 2007 | |
75,000 | 150,000 | From January 1, 2000, until June 30, 2003 | ||
1,000,000 | From January 1, 1999, until December 31, 1999 | |||
100,000 | 250,000 | Until December 31, 1998 |
(Rest of table showing other formats omitted for this discussion.)
Now, apart from the idea, I have a concern about the content; my examination of the AMPROFON source leads me to believe our current table is incorrect. (We aren't helped by the tricky arrangement of AMPROFON's Criterios Para La Certificación De Ventas De Albumes table; I believe their third-last row should be at the bottom for increased clarity.)
Currently, we seem to say that albums received Gold awards at 100,000 until well after December 31, 1999, (like 2000, or maybe 2003, or something, but for me, it's not clear) after which the threshold was 75,000. My reading of the AMPROFON table is that the changeover occurred before 1999 ("Lanzamientos Anteriores A 1999," so we can say January 1, 1999). It seems pretty clear that the Gold/Platinum threshold change came before the Diamond change, but that's the opposite of what we show now. Maybe it's just my weak Spanish.
Can anybody check my work, please? My table above is my translation of what I thing the AMPROFON table is trying to tell us. Please chime in with whatever errors (logical or typographical) you see. Thanks. And, er, muchas gracias. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 13:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
I've finally gotten around to updating the table, and I note as I do that the above discussion left out some info I've now seen. I believe the AMPROFON Web site I pointed to above has simply not been kept current (as of today), while the albums thresholds have been changed. The Top 100 charts (and the Top 2 genre charts) produced by AMPROFON and published as PDF files at greaves.tv include legends at the bottom with threshold information. For example, the Gold symbol is explained as: Disco de Oro. Certificación de ventas por 30,000 copias vendidas para lanzamientos a partir de julio de 2009. Certificación de ventas por 40,000 copias vendidas para lanzamientos de enero de 2008 a junio de 2009.
I take this to mean that the album thresholds were changed (reduced) yet again on June 30/July 1, 2009. The webmaster just hasn't gotten around to adding that tidbit yet. I'm basing my edits today on this combination of the two sources. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 00:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Asociación Mexicana de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:48, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Asociación Mexicana de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Asociación Mexicana de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Mexican association of Producers of Phonograms and Videograms was copied or moved into Asociación Mexicana de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas with this edit on 17:48, 22 May 2012 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
I would like to rework the "Album" portion of the Sales certificates table, because we've currently got a weird mish-mash of "Since" and "Until" across five rows of the section, and it's hard (for me, at least) to determine what thresholds applied when. I would like to replace the current notes with clearer phrases including "From" and "until". So first of all, I'd like to hear what others think of this idea, which would look like this:
Format | Thresholds [1] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Gold | Platinum | Diamond | Notes | |
Album | 40,000 | 80,000 | 400,000 | Since January 1, 2008 |
50,000 | 100,000 | 500,000 | From July 1, 2003, until December 31, 2007 | |
75,000 | 150,000 | From January 1, 2000, until June 30, 2003 | ||
1,000,000 | From January 1, 1999, until December 31, 1999 | |||
100,000 | 250,000 | Until December 31, 1998 |
(Rest of table showing other formats omitted for this discussion.)
Now, apart from the idea, I have a concern about the content; my examination of the AMPROFON source leads me to believe our current table is incorrect. (We aren't helped by the tricky arrangement of AMPROFON's Criterios Para La Certificación De Ventas De Albumes table; I believe their third-last row should be at the bottom for increased clarity.)
Currently, we seem to say that albums received Gold awards at 100,000 until well after December 31, 1999, (like 2000, or maybe 2003, or something, but for me, it's not clear) after which the threshold was 75,000. My reading of the AMPROFON table is that the changeover occurred before 1999 ("Lanzamientos Anteriores A 1999," so we can say January 1, 1999). It seems pretty clear that the Gold/Platinum threshold change came before the Diamond change, but that's the opposite of what we show now. Maybe it's just my weak Spanish.
Can anybody check my work, please? My table above is my translation of what I thing the AMPROFON table is trying to tell us. Please chime in with whatever errors (logical or typographical) you see. Thanks. And, er, muchas gracias. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 13:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
I've finally gotten around to updating the table, and I note as I do that the above discussion left out some info I've now seen. I believe the AMPROFON Web site I pointed to above has simply not been kept current (as of today), while the albums thresholds have been changed. The Top 100 charts (and the Top 2 genre charts) produced by AMPROFON and published as PDF files at greaves.tv include legends at the bottom with threshold information. For example, the Gold symbol is explained as: Disco de Oro. Certificación de ventas por 30,000 copias vendidas para lanzamientos a partir de julio de 2009. Certificación de ventas por 40,000 copias vendidas para lanzamientos de enero de 2008 a junio de 2009.
I take this to mean that the album thresholds were changed (reduced) yet again on June 30/July 1, 2009. The webmaster just hasn't gotten around to adding that tidbit yet. I'm basing my edits today on this combination of the two sources. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 00:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Asociación Mexicana de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:48, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Asociación Mexicana de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)