GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: No Great Shaker ( talk · contribs) 08:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
For reviews, I use the above list of criteria as a benchmark and complete the variables as I go along. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker ( talk) 08:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I remember when I studied ancient history eons ago that there was doubt and even controversy about the last years of Assurbanipal with differing views about the date of his death ranging from 631 to 627/626. Personally, I always favoured 631 for the very reason given here – the final contemporary evidence. A figure like Assurbanipal would have continued to be recorded somehow if he had lived another four or five years, and so it is logical to assert that he died c.631 and was then succeeded by Assuretillilani. Anyway, the sources you've cited cover the question more than adequately.
I made a few tweaks as I went along but there was nothing of any great significance. The article is very well written. The narrative is to the point and is importantly within scope, avoiding the obvious pitfall of over-speculation about an enigmatic subject like Assuretillilani. It easily passes GA. Good work. No Great Shaker ( talk) 11:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: No Great Shaker ( talk · contribs) 08:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
For reviews, I use the above list of criteria as a benchmark and complete the variables as I go along. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker ( talk) 08:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I remember when I studied ancient history eons ago that there was doubt and even controversy about the last years of Assurbanipal with differing views about the date of his death ranging from 631 to 627/626. Personally, I always favoured 631 for the very reason given here – the final contemporary evidence. A figure like Assurbanipal would have continued to be recorded somehow if he had lived another four or five years, and so it is logical to assert that he died c.631 and was then succeeded by Assuretillilani. Anyway, the sources you've cited cover the question more than adequately.
I made a few tweaks as I went along but there was nothing of any great significance. The article is very well written. The narrative is to the point and is importantly within scope, avoiding the obvious pitfall of over-speculation about an enigmatic subject like Assuretillilani. It easily passes GA. Good work. No Great Shaker ( talk) 11:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)