Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3E1I5S8B9RF7 ( talk · contribs) 11:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Assessment

The article is reasonably well written, stable, neutral and free of tagged images. It has been improved recently.-- 3E1I5S8B9RF7 ( talk) 11:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Conclusion

I think the article meets the GA criteria. I am promoting it, accordingly.-- 3E1I5S8B9RF7 ( talk) 11:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed