Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin ( talk · contribs) 09:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. ( reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. ( OR):

   d. ( copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. ( major aspects):

   b. ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Lead

1. Should clarify details about the Deadlock gang in the body of the article - particularly mentioning that it was formed as an arms-dealing gang and that it's based out of Arizona.
   1. Fixed. Removed the Arizona bit too, it didn't add anything.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 21:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Concept and development

1. Is Blizzplanet an appropriate source?
   1. It's had direct dealing with Blizzard Entertainment in the past, and I also linked to a recording of the panel itself on Web Archive for each citation.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 04:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Design

1. "Two notable skins include "Mobster" and "Safari"" Is this a pair of skins, or just skins for Ashe that have an accompanying B.O.B. costume?
   1. Fixed I think?-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 00:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Aight, all done. - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 19:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC) reply