This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
You can help expand this article with text translated from
the corresponding article in German. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
You can help expand this article with text translated from
the corresponding article in Polish. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
This page gets a large number of page views - about 800 per day, but is rightly classed as "start" class. The much fuller History of Chinese art (B class) gets fewer than half as many views. A problem both pages share is that they include literature, music and drama and other performance arts. They thus cover The arts rather than art, the latter normally meaning just visual art in English and on en:Wikipedia - see other articles such as German art. I propose the following:
Comments please? 23:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't think that this page should be listed as a page requiring translation from Polish/German. Isthisuseful ( talk) 21:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
At the moment it looks rather disorganized and I'm not quite sure why it is organized this way. Most of the entry are about Chinese literature interspersed with some random pieces of information about other arts. You can't really have a page about the arts and so little information about paintings (just one rather odd section), sculpture and architecture, or music, etc. This page is really rather lopsided. Why not organized it as literature (some the information can be moved to Chinese literature), painting and sculpture, architecture, folk art, performance art including dramatic art, music, etc.? Expand other sections where necessary, and there should be some kind of coordination with other related pages like Chinese art and Chinese culture. Hzh ( talk) 23:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
You can help expand this article with text translated from
the corresponding article in German. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
You can help expand this article with text translated from
the corresponding article in Polish. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
This page gets a large number of page views - about 800 per day, but is rightly classed as "start" class. The much fuller History of Chinese art (B class) gets fewer than half as many views. A problem both pages share is that they include literature, music and drama and other performance arts. They thus cover The arts rather than art, the latter normally meaning just visual art in English and on en:Wikipedia - see other articles such as German art. I propose the following:
Comments please? 23:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't think that this page should be listed as a page requiring translation from Polish/German. Isthisuseful ( talk) 21:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
At the moment it looks rather disorganized and I'm not quite sure why it is organized this way. Most of the entry are about Chinese literature interspersed with some random pieces of information about other arts. You can't really have a page about the arts and so little information about paintings (just one rather odd section), sculpture and architecture, or music, etc. This page is really rather lopsided. Why not organized it as literature (some the information can be moved to Chinese literature), painting and sculpture, architecture, folk art, performance art including dramatic art, music, etc.? Expand other sections where necessary, and there should be some kind of coordination with other related pages like Chinese art and Chinese culture. Hzh ( talk) 23:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC)