![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There's a need for a disambiguation page for Clough. A search of the word takes one to the page for the village of Clough with no mention of the poet. 01:24 05 Sept 2005 soverman
Why is "The French Lieutenant's Woman" (1969), by John Fowles, listed in the bibliography? Is Clough a character in the book? A comment would be helpful? I have added the Emerson-Clough letters and begun reformatting the bibliography, but do not at present have all the info I need to format all entries. Mddietz 15:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
I have corrected the apostrophe and added the text in Brackets in - 'The Latest Decalogue's couplet on murder, "Thou shalt not kill; but needst not strive officiously to keep alive:" is often quoted in debates on medical ethics in the sense that it is not right to struggle to keep terminally ill people alive, especially if they are suffering. (The poem read in full has an ironic tone.)' The word is 'needst', and 'need'st' was wrong. I have added the text in parentheses because the couplet 'often quoted' might even be said to be 'popularly mis-quoted' given the rest of the Peom and the ironic sense of its commentary on the Ten Commandments-revised. Thank you. JM
143.229.177.162, I applaud your recent changes and thank you very much for improving an article that very much had needed to be reworked. The old article carried forward the late nineteenth and early twentieth century's appraisals of Clough and badly needed a good mending. I will say, however, that I wish you would sign your work and add the necessary citations.
I do have a few small quibbles (both with your changes and the material you have left in) and I hope you do not mind my stating them here. Note this is all off the top of my head, and I am likely to have gotten a good bit of it wrong; without a direct appeal to the accepted references I would not suggest making any further changes:
It's natural to want to move wholly in one direction or another. Either Clough is a failed poet or a great master; a faithful religionist or a skeptical atheist,-- but Clough is perhaps most intriguing for his resolute stand between two worlds. This article does, indeed, need work. Your efforts have, frankly, considerably improved it. But the work should really be done reference in hand with citations clearly labelled. Mddietz 19:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 180.200.185.105 ( talk) 01:53, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
How do you pronounce Clough? Is it Enough? I haven't a Clue! Bluefox79830 ( talk) 21:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Arthur Hugh Clough. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arthur Hugh Clough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There's a need for a disambiguation page for Clough. A search of the word takes one to the page for the village of Clough with no mention of the poet. 01:24 05 Sept 2005 soverman
Why is "The French Lieutenant's Woman" (1969), by John Fowles, listed in the bibliography? Is Clough a character in the book? A comment would be helpful? I have added the Emerson-Clough letters and begun reformatting the bibliography, but do not at present have all the info I need to format all entries. Mddietz 15:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
I have corrected the apostrophe and added the text in Brackets in - 'The Latest Decalogue's couplet on murder, "Thou shalt not kill; but needst not strive officiously to keep alive:" is often quoted in debates on medical ethics in the sense that it is not right to struggle to keep terminally ill people alive, especially if they are suffering. (The poem read in full has an ironic tone.)' The word is 'needst', and 'need'st' was wrong. I have added the text in parentheses because the couplet 'often quoted' might even be said to be 'popularly mis-quoted' given the rest of the Peom and the ironic sense of its commentary on the Ten Commandments-revised. Thank you. JM
143.229.177.162, I applaud your recent changes and thank you very much for improving an article that very much had needed to be reworked. The old article carried forward the late nineteenth and early twentieth century's appraisals of Clough and badly needed a good mending. I will say, however, that I wish you would sign your work and add the necessary citations.
I do have a few small quibbles (both with your changes and the material you have left in) and I hope you do not mind my stating them here. Note this is all off the top of my head, and I am likely to have gotten a good bit of it wrong; without a direct appeal to the accepted references I would not suggest making any further changes:
It's natural to want to move wholly in one direction or another. Either Clough is a failed poet or a great master; a faithful religionist or a skeptical atheist,-- but Clough is perhaps most intriguing for his resolute stand between two worlds. This article does, indeed, need work. Your efforts have, frankly, considerably improved it. But the work should really be done reference in hand with citations clearly labelled. Mddietz 19:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 180.200.185.105 ( talk) 01:53, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
How do you pronounce Clough? Is it Enough? I haven't a Clue! Bluefox79830 ( talk) 21:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Arthur Hugh Clough. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arthur Hugh Clough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)