This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Artemis 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
The subject (and infobox) encompass with 2 programs: Orion program and Artemis program. The infobox is designed for only one, and Artemis 3 being part of the Artemis program, should logically have priority over Orion. Rowan Forest ( talk) 19:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
The article is inconsistent. It has changed to the new name in the frame of the “Boots on the Moon by 2024” program, but its description is still based on the “Orion focused on the assembly of the Gateway” paradigm. Hektor ( talk) 09:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Since two astronauts are to land on the lunar surface while two will remain in orbit, is this because the Integrated Lander Vehicle doesn't have enough space for more astronauts, or is it just an exception for that mission? It should be made clear in the article. 212.186.15.63 ( talk) 09:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Since NASA selected HLS as the lunar landing module and since the latter won't be ready before 2025 [1] [2], it might be worth updating the launch date to NET 2025? Pcauchy ( talk) 10:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
I agree, the article needs to be updated. Turtleshell3 ( talk) 21:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
Hi everyone. Can we change the launch date to September 2024 because of a date change according to NASA's office of safety and mission assurance. Here is the reference https://web.archive.org/web/20210614003506/https://sma.nasa.gov/docs/default-source/sma-disciplines-and-programs/smsr/smsr-intergrated-master-schedule_24feb2020aab4a269d2a865b9a1a0ff0f003ca228.pdf?sfvrsn=8290faf8_26
Never mind I changed it. But somebody needs to add the reference.
Official name of the mission, has a lot of use. PrecariousWorlds ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
NHRO versus NRHO typo on orbital diagram.
There is a typo and “NHRO” is on the diagram instead of the correct acronym “NRHO”.
This is for Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit.
To be clear, the verbiage within the article is correct. The issue is related to the visualization diagram only.
-Jason Hildebrand
Houston, TX 2600:1700:4274:8410:504B:773:F2E1:AC77 ( talk) 21:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Artemis 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
The subject (and infobox) encompass with 2 programs: Orion program and Artemis program. The infobox is designed for only one, and Artemis 3 being part of the Artemis program, should logically have priority over Orion. Rowan Forest ( talk) 19:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
The article is inconsistent. It has changed to the new name in the frame of the “Boots on the Moon by 2024” program, but its description is still based on the “Orion focused on the assembly of the Gateway” paradigm. Hektor ( talk) 09:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Since two astronauts are to land on the lunar surface while two will remain in orbit, is this because the Integrated Lander Vehicle doesn't have enough space for more astronauts, or is it just an exception for that mission? It should be made clear in the article. 212.186.15.63 ( talk) 09:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Since NASA selected HLS as the lunar landing module and since the latter won't be ready before 2025 [1] [2], it might be worth updating the launch date to NET 2025? Pcauchy ( talk) 10:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
I agree, the article needs to be updated. Turtleshell3 ( talk) 21:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
Hi everyone. Can we change the launch date to September 2024 because of a date change according to NASA's office of safety and mission assurance. Here is the reference https://web.archive.org/web/20210614003506/https://sma.nasa.gov/docs/default-source/sma-disciplines-and-programs/smsr/smsr-intergrated-master-schedule_24feb2020aab4a269d2a865b9a1a0ff0f003ca228.pdf?sfvrsn=8290faf8_26
Never mind I changed it. But somebody needs to add the reference.
Official name of the mission, has a lot of use. PrecariousWorlds ( talk) 09:18, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
NHRO versus NRHO typo on orbital diagram.
There is a typo and “NHRO” is on the diagram instead of the correct acronym “NRHO”.
This is for Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit.
To be clear, the verbiage within the article is correct. The issue is related to the visualization diagram only.
-Jason Hildebrand
Houston, TX 2600:1700:4274:8410:504B:773:F2E1:AC77 ( talk) 21:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)