This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We've already had a discussion about having links to all websites that come down the pike...Wikipedia isn't a web directory. -- Larry Sanger
What exactly is the worth of this article? The ArtCyclopeida is a valuable resource, but I don't think it requires a separate encyclopedia article. Referencing it in relevant art articles should be enough. Tullie 20:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't see any reason to single this article out for deletion while retaining articles about similar web resources, as listed in Category:Virtual art museums and galleries. At a bare minimum, the proposed deletion should be discussed at AfD. Artcyclopedia seems to be widely respected, as indicated by the following collection of online reviews, articles, and awards:
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We've already had a discussion about having links to all websites that come down the pike...Wikipedia isn't a web directory. -- Larry Sanger
What exactly is the worth of this article? The ArtCyclopeida is a valuable resource, but I don't think it requires a separate encyclopedia article. Referencing it in relevant art articles should be enough. Tullie 20:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't see any reason to single this article out for deletion while retaining articles about similar web resources, as listed in Category:Virtual art museums and galleries. At a bare minimum, the proposed deletion should be discussed at AfD. Artcyclopedia seems to be widely respected, as indicated by the following collection of online reviews, articles, and awards: