![]() | A fact from Arrow (rail service) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 29 November 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Arrow (rail service). |
I've put a series of headings in, to try to make it easier to keep the piece updated as to the historical status and current status of the project: in other words, to enable readers to see quickly what happened in the past and what (if anything) is happening now. At the moment, that means when construction is going to start; during the construction phase, how it's progressing. If and when the line is open, the whole narrative can go into the history section and "Current Status" eliminated, and then the section headings reorganized along the lines (pun intended!) of those on existing Wikipedia pages for operational railways. LDGE ( talk) 00:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Redlands Passenger Rail Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:46, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
If you look at the new Arrow website ( [1] ), it's been fully branded as a part of Metrolink: it's called "Metrolink Arrow" throughout, the pictures of the stations, even the ones that will only be served by Arrow trains, show that all the signage there says "Metrolink" rather than "Arrow", and passengers use the same ticketing machines and system that Metrolink uses. Should we be including Arrow as one of the lines on the Metrolink page, and making the connection between the two of them clearer here? -- Jfruh ( talk) 16:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from Arrow (rail service) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 29 November 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Arrow (rail service). |
I've put a series of headings in, to try to make it easier to keep the piece updated as to the historical status and current status of the project: in other words, to enable readers to see quickly what happened in the past and what (if anything) is happening now. At the moment, that means when construction is going to start; during the construction phase, how it's progressing. If and when the line is open, the whole narrative can go into the history section and "Current Status" eliminated, and then the section headings reorganized along the lines (pun intended!) of those on existing Wikipedia pages for operational railways. LDGE ( talk) 00:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Redlands Passenger Rail Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:46, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
If you look at the new Arrow website ( [1] ), it's been fully branded as a part of Metrolink: it's called "Metrolink Arrow" throughout, the pictures of the stations, even the ones that will only be served by Arrow trains, show that all the signage there says "Metrolink" rather than "Arrow", and passengers use the same ticketing machines and system that Metrolink uses. Should we be including Arrow as one of the lines on the Metrolink page, and making the connection between the two of them clearer here? -- Jfruh ( talk) 16:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)