A fact from Arnold Wolfers appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 December 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 20:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't pretend to entirely understand the 29 printed pages of DYK rules, but I'm pretty sure that the edit history does not allow this to be put up for DYK. The article underwent some significant changes recently, but it has been in the mainspace for six years in a form that is rather similar to the current version for large sections of the text, and the recent edits are nowhere near enough for 5X expansion. I would suggest either asking for a bye on the DYK talk, or taking this to GA status. I would strongly suggest the latter, because there are a significant number of grammar issues that should be solved one way or the other and going GA will get that solved. Those aren't needed for DYK, of course, but GA seems to be so you may as well go for the two-fer.
Maury Markowitz (
talk) 17:48, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Maury Markowitz: It was started in my user sandbox back in 2014–15 and but never finished. Only on November 7 of this year did it get moved to article mainspace - see
this edit that did that. I then finished it and nominated it on November 14, within seven days, so it counts as 'new' in DYK terms. If there are grammar issues with the article, please point them out whether or not they are part of the DYK criteria and I will work on them. Or if it's easier for you just to make changes directly yourself, that's fine with me too.
Wasted Time R (
talk) 18:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Maury Markowitz: I've just made through the article trying to give it a fresh read and you were right, there were a number of missing words and other mistakes. Hopefully I've now corrected most of what you saw.
Wasted Time R (
talk) 20:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
as noted above, the dates are good. It is very odd that one cannot see this in the History tab, it implies it was mainspace the entire time.
Maury Markowitz (
talk) 14:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)reply
A fact from Arnold Wolfers appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 December 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 20:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't pretend to entirely understand the 29 printed pages of DYK rules, but I'm pretty sure that the edit history does not allow this to be put up for DYK. The article underwent some significant changes recently, but it has been in the mainspace for six years in a form that is rather similar to the current version for large sections of the text, and the recent edits are nowhere near enough for 5X expansion. I would suggest either asking for a bye on the DYK talk, or taking this to GA status. I would strongly suggest the latter, because there are a significant number of grammar issues that should be solved one way or the other and going GA will get that solved. Those aren't needed for DYK, of course, but GA seems to be so you may as well go for the two-fer.
Maury Markowitz (
talk) 17:48, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Maury Markowitz: It was started in my user sandbox back in 2014–15 and but never finished. Only on November 7 of this year did it get moved to article mainspace - see
this edit that did that. I then finished it and nominated it on November 14, within seven days, so it counts as 'new' in DYK terms. If there are grammar issues with the article, please point them out whether or not they are part of the DYK criteria and I will work on them. Or if it's easier for you just to make changes directly yourself, that's fine with me too.
Wasted Time R (
talk) 18:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Maury Markowitz: I've just made through the article trying to give it a fresh read and you were right, there were a number of missing words and other mistakes. Hopefully I've now corrected most of what you saw.
Wasted Time R (
talk) 20:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
as noted above, the dates are good. It is very odd that one cannot see this in the History tab, it implies it was mainspace the entire time.
Maury Markowitz (
talk) 14:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)reply