This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References to Beckett are of little worth (nihil velis). Lestrade ( talk) 20:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Lestrade
Maybe we should remove the Beckett reference at the beginning of the article because it is repeated at the end of the article. 173.72.63.96 ( talk) 17:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Scott Palmström
Ita est, ergo ita sit. Is this really accurately translated by "It exists, therefore it is so"? I can think of a dozen ways to translate this phrase, but the translation given is not one of them.
Et cetera. A context for the quote will be necessary to determine what its meaning is, but I don't see any context that can make it "It exists, therefore it is so". Rwflammang ( talk) 16:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References to Beckett are of little worth (nihil velis). Lestrade ( talk) 20:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Lestrade
Maybe we should remove the Beckett reference at the beginning of the article because it is repeated at the end of the article. 173.72.63.96 ( talk) 17:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Scott Palmström
Ita est, ergo ita sit. Is this really accurately translated by "It exists, therefore it is so"? I can think of a dozen ways to translate this phrase, but the translation given is not one of them.
Et cetera. A context for the quote will be necessary to determine what its meaning is, but I don't see any context that can make it "It exists, therefore it is so". Rwflammang ( talk) 16:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)