![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=ARM_Holdings&diff=573705691&oldid=573703902
Unsourced (or citation needed) is not tolerated in ARM Holdings page. It's much more strict that "ARM Architecture". Now this material I deleted under time pressure has no home. comp.arch ( talk) 22:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
I feel kind of bad for trying to clean up ARM Architecture, I did and dumped the mess here, just didn't realize it was such a mess/strict here. I just copy pasted.
Do add (move) what is down here (one at a time is ok) with citations in the article page not down below. This is just the deleted text for convinience.
Deleted text:
ARM architectural licence:
Companies with 32-bit architectural licence include Apple Inc. citation needed <Must have one since many Apple processors are "labelled" Apple-design and couldn't be witout an architectural licence. The very least they have a regular one in not "Apple-designed". A7 the 64-bit has one credible source ( AnandTech) saying it's also Apple-designed.>
Intel citation needed (through its settlement with Digital Equipment Corporation), <Intell still making ARMs? Historically important since DEC first and Intel got that licence?>
and Qualcomm citation needed.
Distinct 32-bit custom-designd ARM architecture implementations by licensees include Qualcomm's Krait (or Scorpion) in Snapdragon <DONE Krait or older Scorpion link>,
DEC's StrongARM <First "ARM-clone". Influde since historically important?>,
Marvell's (formerly Intel's) XScale. <Next after StrongARM?>
ARM core licence:
Companies that are current licensees of 64-bit ARM core designs include Apple ( A7) citation needed, AppliedMicro ( X-Gene), AMD, Calxeda, HiSilicon (Huawei's),<Done, these are the "same thing", which one to use and others. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Companies that are current or former licensees of 32-bit (and some for 64-bit) ARM core designs (some for microcontrollers) include AMD, [5] Alcatel-Lucent, Altera, Analog Devices, Apple Inc., AppliedMicro, Atmel, BlackBerry (formerly Research In Motion), Cirrus Logic, CSR plc, Cypress Semiconductor, Ember, Energy Micro, Faraday Technology, Fujitsu, Fuzhou Rockchip, Huawei (HiSilicon division) [6], IBM, [7] Infineon Technologies ( Infineon XMC 32-bit MCU families), [8] Intel (DEC), LG, Marvell, MediaTek, Microsemi, NEC, Nintendo, Nuvoton, NXP Semiconductors (formerly Philips Semiconductor), Oki, ON Semiconductor, Panasonic, Qualcomm, Sharp, Silicon Labs, Sony, ST-Ericsson, STMicroelectronics, Symbios Logic, Toshiba, Yamaha, Xilinx and ZiiLABS.
comp.arch ( talk) 22:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=ARM_Holdings&diff=573705691&oldid=573703902
Unsourced (or citation needed) is not tolerated in ARM Holdings page. It's much more strict that "ARM Architecture". Now this material I deleted under time pressure has no home. comp.arch ( talk) 22:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
I feel kind of bad for trying to clean up ARM Architecture, I did and dumped the mess here, just didn't realize it was such a mess/strict here. I just copy pasted.
Do add (move) what is down here (one at a time is ok) with citations in the article page not down below. This is just the deleted text for convinience.
Deleted text:
ARM architectural licence:
Companies with 32-bit architectural licence include Apple Inc. citation needed <Must have one since many Apple processors are "labelled" Apple-design and couldn't be witout an architectural licence. The very least they have a regular one in not "Apple-designed". A7 the 64-bit has one credible source ( AnandTech) saying it's also Apple-designed.>
Intel citation needed (through its settlement with Digital Equipment Corporation), <Intell still making ARMs? Historically important since DEC first and Intel got that licence?>
and Qualcomm citation needed.
Distinct 32-bit custom-designd ARM architecture implementations by licensees include Qualcomm's Krait (or Scorpion) in Snapdragon <DONE Krait or older Scorpion link>,
DEC's StrongARM <First "ARM-clone". Influde since historically important?>,
Marvell's (formerly Intel's) XScale. <Next after StrongARM?>
ARM core licence:
Companies that are current licensees of 64-bit ARM core designs include Apple ( A7) citation needed, AppliedMicro ( X-Gene), AMD, Calxeda, HiSilicon (Huawei's),<Done, these are the "same thing", which one to use and others. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Companies that are current or former licensees of 32-bit (and some for 64-bit) ARM core designs (some for microcontrollers) include AMD, [5] Alcatel-Lucent, Altera, Analog Devices, Apple Inc., AppliedMicro, Atmel, BlackBerry (formerly Research In Motion), Cirrus Logic, CSR plc, Cypress Semiconductor, Ember, Energy Micro, Faraday Technology, Fujitsu, Fuzhou Rockchip, Huawei (HiSilicon division) [6], IBM, [7] Infineon Technologies ( Infineon XMC 32-bit MCU families), [8] Intel (DEC), LG, Marvell, MediaTek, Microsemi, NEC, Nintendo, Nuvoton, NXP Semiconductors (formerly Philips Semiconductor), Oki, ON Semiconductor, Panasonic, Qualcomm, Sharp, Silicon Labs, Sony, ST-Ericsson, STMicroelectronics, Symbios Logic, Toshiba, Yamaha, Xilinx and ZiiLABS.
comp.arch ( talk) 22:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)