This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Arduino article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Arduino was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 4, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Arduino was copied or moved into List of Arduino compatibles with this edit on 13 August 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
I propose that we split this article, similar to how it was done for the Raspberry Pi: Raspberry Pi and Raspberry Pi Foundation.
If this concept isn't the best way to deal with the legal mess, then we need to reword the intro to be more targeted of the products, and keep the legal mess in a special section.
• Sbmeirow • Talk • 05:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
For example, see Raspberry Pi and Raspberry Pi Foundation. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 19:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
OK, is "Arduino" the name of the stuff that's open-source-able, or the name of a company? The company has to be seen as separate, because even though it can do open-source-able things, it isn't itself open source, or obligated to only be involved in open-source projects. - Inowen ( nlfte) 06:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Is there a page here that talks about the Syntax?
I think we should add a page for syntax or some books about Arduino teaching about the code. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BuildersHutGames ( talk • contribs) 16:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Article Garbage collection (computer science)#Limited environments claims that "The Arduino language includes GC as well.". A few people partially agree: "garbage collection is better on the ESPs than on the AVRs (as in, ESPs do garbage collection)". Is that so? DavidCary ( talk) 21:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Sub section Legacy IDE:
What does not even mean?
Even corrected to "the Arduino IDE Windows compiler supports only Windows 7 or a newer OS", it still does not make much sense. E.g., on Windows, does the Arduino IDE now require Windows 7 or later? Why talk about a compiler? Perhaps the process of compilation (enabled by installing and running the IDE) was meant? Or "newer OS", implying something other operating systems than Windows (the intent may or may not be to say something about Windows only).
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Arduino article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Arduino was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 4, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Arduino was copied or moved into List of Arduino compatibles with this edit on 13 August 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
I propose that we split this article, similar to how it was done for the Raspberry Pi: Raspberry Pi and Raspberry Pi Foundation.
If this concept isn't the best way to deal with the legal mess, then we need to reword the intro to be more targeted of the products, and keep the legal mess in a special section.
• Sbmeirow • Talk • 05:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
For example, see Raspberry Pi and Raspberry Pi Foundation. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 19:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
OK, is "Arduino" the name of the stuff that's open-source-able, or the name of a company? The company has to be seen as separate, because even though it can do open-source-able things, it isn't itself open source, or obligated to only be involved in open-source projects. - Inowen ( nlfte) 06:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Is there a page here that talks about the Syntax?
I think we should add a page for syntax or some books about Arduino teaching about the code. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BuildersHutGames ( talk • contribs) 16:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Article Garbage collection (computer science)#Limited environments claims that "The Arduino language includes GC as well.". A few people partially agree: "garbage collection is better on the ESPs than on the AVRs (as in, ESPs do garbage collection)". Is that so? DavidCary ( talk) 21:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Sub section Legacy IDE:
What does not even mean?
Even corrected to "the Arduino IDE Windows compiler supports only Windows 7 or a newer OS", it still does not make much sense. E.g., on Windows, does the Arduino IDE now require Windows 7 or later? Why talk about a compiler? Perhaps the process of compilation (enabled by installing and running the IDE) was meant? Or "newer OS", implying something other operating systems than Windows (the intent may or may not be to say something about Windows only).