Ardeshir Tarapore has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 29, 2018. ( Reviewed version).

A fact from Ardeshir Tarapore appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 July 2018 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that under the leadership of Lieutenant Colonel Ardeshir Tarapore, the Poona Horse regiment, 17th Battalion, destroyed sixty Pakistani tanks during the Battle of Chawinda? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ardeshir Tarapore.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Zoroastrianism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoroastrianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Zoroastrianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZoroastrianismWikipedia:WikiProject ZoroastrianismTemplate:WikiProject ZoroastrianismZoroastrianism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Military This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance). India: Mumbai Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in May 2012. Military history: Biography / Asian / Indian / South Asia / World War II / Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force Asian military history task force Indian military history task force South Asian military history task force World War II task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Dhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 30 November 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ardeshir Tarapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060502021809/http://www.indianarmy.nic.in:80/PVC/photo_10.htm to http://indianarmy.nic.in/PVC/photo_10.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Link works and seems useful. Dhtwiki ( talk) 09:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Some observations:

• Is there no more on his WWII experience?
• IMO the "Battle of Chawinda" section needs an initial sentence introducing the war, and possibly the reason for it.
• IMO, immediately after this, you need to state briefly what I Corps' plan was, that Poona Horse was a part of I Corps, and where PH's plan fitted into I Corps' plan.

I have been on the bold side with my edits, so could you check them carefully. Gog the Mild ( talk) 16:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Gog the Mild: Your edits are excellent. Thanks for your comments, I'll work on them. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 06:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: No problem; and thank you. I assume that you are going for GA with this, so I tried to pitch my copy edit at that level. Good luck with it. Gog the Mild ( talk) 08:55, 1 June 2018 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ardeshir Tarapore/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 ( talk · contribs) 16:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply

I'll start this in a day or two. auntieruth (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for taking up the nomination. I'll be looking forward for your comments. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga

( talk • mail) 16:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply

• minor tweaks on verb agreement and clarity here
• this sentence doesn't make sense to me: However, this operation failed as the presence of Pakistani troops was reported locals. auntieruth (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Auntieruth55: Thanks for the review. I've amended the sentence to be clear. Kindly take a look. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 16:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Auntieruth55: Thanks for review. Please update the article class on the talk page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 03:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: