This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Archaeology Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Oceans Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Oceans To-do List: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : List of oceanographers, create a comprehensive article on Concentrations of marine debris out of all the gyre and "garbage patch" articles Copyedit : Draft:Terrance (octopus) Expand : Coral Sea, Endeavour Strait, Greenland Sea, Solomon Sea Photo : find images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the oceans Stubs : Oceanography stub articles, Marine geography stub articles, Aleutian Trench, Bellingshausen Sea, Caernarfon Bay, Gerlache Strait, Gulf of Oman, Iceland Sea, Draft:Terrance (octopus) Update : Botany Bay, Wilkins Sound, Mariana Trench, Challenger Deep Verify : Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Bering Sea, Gulf of Aden, Iceberg B-15, Ionian Sea, Japan Trench, Moreton Bay, Sound (geography), Timor Sea Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia

This article is a copy and paste of a section from the North Sea article. See talk page there. If there is a better way to move it please let me know, or do it, and I will peek in. The section was originally added to the North SEa article by user Rosiestep Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 01:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC) reply

• I think this content should be in "Early history" - or before it, if you prefer to restrict "history" to written records. -- Philcha ( talk) 14:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• The section does not say enough to establish relevance to the N Sea. -- Philcha ( talk) 14:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• I also think you need to say more about what the scientists thought they found, to show that this is not just another crackpot Atlantis story. -- Philcha ( talk) 14:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply
• Danish, Swedish archaeologists announce vast underground city in North Sea is from a site for science and fantasy fiction enthusiasts, not a WP:RS for a science topic - see comment above on Atlantis. You really need to find a better source, search Google Scholar for artciles by the head honcho, van Gelder. -- Philcha ( talk) 14:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply

It's also published a few hours before April 1, 2005, and the link for the "alpine giant" mentioned in the article goes to an even more obvious joke published April 1, 2001 on the same site. This is an obvious hoax, I'm deleting it from the article. 85.224.117.200 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC). reply

• Lost world warning from North Sea is from the BBC and is very reliable as accurate as news reports get. However the actual journal papers by Gaffney & co. would be better. BTW the map showing the Channel land bridge and the Dogger Hills is great, if you can find the journal papers to back it up I suggest you ask Wikipedia:Graphic Lab to produce a similar map. The "Geology" section might be a good place, as the map shows the N Sea in its penultimate form. -- Philcha ( talk) 14:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply