This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Archaeology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Ancient Near East This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The reading of Dupont-Sommer seems to be the minority view. In this article it is written that Schlumberger proved it is Tdmr not Trmd, but the source given does not mention this. A note (note number 11) was added to the article of Palmyra and it summarize the scholarly debate.-- Attar-Aram syria ( talk) 12:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the very good summary in Note 11 of the Palmyra article. I will reflect it here when I have a bit more time to edit. पाटलिपुत्र ( talk) 16:52, 1 August 2018 (UTC) ...or... you're very welcome to make the modifications directly in "Aramaic Inscription of Laghman". Thanks again! पाटलिपुत्र ( talk) 17:01, 1 August 2018 (UTC) reply