This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Arado E.381 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Arado E.381 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can we use either Notes or References and not both, East of Borschov? AirplanePro Radio Checklist 19:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I have reassessed this now as Start class, from a B. Although it is clearly a very obscure aircraft, and this no doubt means that it will always be fairly brief, I feel that the article is not yet comprehensive enough to meet this standard. Specifically a table of aircraft specifications could be added (which is fairly standard for aircraft articles), while at the same time it also falls down on referencing as only one main work has been cited. If these are added I would be happy to revise this assessment. Good work so far. Anotherclown ( talk) 02:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Copy edits have now been completed as requested. -- Diannaa ( Talk) 20:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer: Parsecboy ( talk) 03:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
General comment: I don't know if it's been done, but this book is available on Google Books that should be examined to see if it has any extra information. Parsecboy ( talk) 11:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Since this wasn't an operational type, shouldn't this be moved to Arado E.381? TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 21:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
User:AirplanePro offered a reward back in June 2010 to get this article up to A class, and since it now is, technically the award should be given to someone. However, AP is no longer active, and therefore will most likely not be giving the award. So I figure either the award can be self-given, or I'd be willing to give the award on behalf of AP, the only thing is, I'm not sure who it should go to. It seems that User:WikiCopter has had the most edits since the offer was placed, but User:AustralianRupert and User:Dank also seem to have contributed. I figure you can work it out between yourselves, or maybe multiple awards can be given, as AP did not seem to stipulate how many people will receive the award. MrKIA11 ( talk) 04:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
The image in this article is not an actual photograph, instead it shows a rendered Ar 234C and E.381 superimposed on a photograph. Please compare with actual photographs of Ar 234C: - http://www.warbirdphotographs.com/LCBW6/Ar234-C3-45af+.jpg Cockpit instrumentation windscreen details should be clearly visible, but are missing. Also note position of the engine cones. The 3D model of Ar 234C and E.381 has also been used for further fakes, see http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/Faked%20German%20Aircraft%20Photos.htm Sansmalrst ( talk) 16:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Arado E.381 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Arado E.381 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can we use either Notes or References and not both, East of Borschov? AirplanePro Radio Checklist 19:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I have reassessed this now as Start class, from a B. Although it is clearly a very obscure aircraft, and this no doubt means that it will always be fairly brief, I feel that the article is not yet comprehensive enough to meet this standard. Specifically a table of aircraft specifications could be added (which is fairly standard for aircraft articles), while at the same time it also falls down on referencing as only one main work has been cited. If these are added I would be happy to revise this assessment. Good work so far. Anotherclown ( talk) 02:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Copy edits have now been completed as requested. -- Diannaa ( Talk) 20:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer: Parsecboy ( talk) 03:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
General comment: I don't know if it's been done, but this book is available on Google Books that should be examined to see if it has any extra information. Parsecboy ( talk) 11:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Since this wasn't an operational type, shouldn't this be moved to Arado E.381? TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 21:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
User:AirplanePro offered a reward back in June 2010 to get this article up to A class, and since it now is, technically the award should be given to someone. However, AP is no longer active, and therefore will most likely not be giving the award. So I figure either the award can be self-given, or I'd be willing to give the award on behalf of AP, the only thing is, I'm not sure who it should go to. It seems that User:WikiCopter has had the most edits since the offer was placed, but User:AustralianRupert and User:Dank also seem to have contributed. I figure you can work it out between yourselves, or maybe multiple awards can be given, as AP did not seem to stipulate how many people will receive the award. MrKIA11 ( talk) 04:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
The image in this article is not an actual photograph, instead it shows a rendered Ar 234C and E.381 superimposed on a photograph. Please compare with actual photographs of Ar 234C: - http://www.warbirdphotographs.com/LCBW6/Ar234-C3-45af+.jpg Cockpit instrumentation windscreen details should be clearly visible, but are missing. Also note position of the engine cones. The 3D model of Ar 234C and E.381 has also been used for further fakes, see http://discaircraft.greyfalcon.us/Faked%20German%20Aircraft%20Photos.htm Sansmalrst ( talk) 16:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)