This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Arabtec receives a significant amount of press coverage, but none of that is reflected in the current version of this article. A quick glance through the history shows that it seems to have been a bit more balanced in the past. I'm concerned that the most recent revisions appear to rely solely on the company's own website. I've tagged the article to reflect this, and hope to dig into it more when I've got a bit of time. I'd appreciate input from others. katherine_a ( talk) 07:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Somebody got rid of the controversies section - this may have been an actual employee who got rid of the controversies and replaced it with an awards section?
Nonetheless, protection for this page should be considered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSP232 ( talk • contribs) 15:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Be sure that some kind of criticism section stays in the article. I see that the article has also had controversies section a year ago.. This page should be protected. Probios ( talk) 18:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
As you can see, the criticism-section has been removed again. Don't let these slave-abusing businessmen win the edit war. http://www.vice.com/video/the-slaves-of-dubai — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.92.98.162 ( talk) 03:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
The controversies and criticism section keeps being removed! This page needs to be protected. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
62.232.114.42 (
talk)
19:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
uoi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.71.134.90 ( talk) 12:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Arabtec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.africanmanager.com/site_eng/detail_article.php?art_id=18105{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.arabtecholding.com/CertificateDetails.aspx?id=13When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:53, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Arabtec receives a significant amount of press coverage, but none of that is reflected in the current version of this article. A quick glance through the history shows that it seems to have been a bit more balanced in the past. I'm concerned that the most recent revisions appear to rely solely on the company's own website. I've tagged the article to reflect this, and hope to dig into it more when I've got a bit of time. I'd appreciate input from others. katherine_a ( talk) 07:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Somebody got rid of the controversies section - this may have been an actual employee who got rid of the controversies and replaced it with an awards section?
Nonetheless, protection for this page should be considered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSP232 ( talk • contribs) 15:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Be sure that some kind of criticism section stays in the article. I see that the article has also had controversies section a year ago.. This page should be protected. Probios ( talk) 18:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
As you can see, the criticism-section has been removed again. Don't let these slave-abusing businessmen win the edit war. http://www.vice.com/video/the-slaves-of-dubai — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.92.98.162 ( talk) 03:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
The controversies and criticism section keeps being removed! This page needs to be protected. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
62.232.114.42 (
talk)
19:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
uoi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.71.134.90 ( talk) 12:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Arabtec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.africanmanager.com/site_eng/detail_article.php?art_id=18105{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.arabtecholding.com/CertificateDetails.aspx?id=13When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:53, 16 October 2016 (UTC)