This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This reads like a brochure. Definitely not neutral. Doesn't it violate the non-promotional rule? -- Vreejack 01:43, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
I believe the link is required, otherwise the text "although he occasionally claimed to have degrees in engineering or nuclear physics" could then be removed as uncited text. (I'm not sure how the opinion "smear site" is justified in this case. That does appear to be a scan and text of an actual CoS publication.) AndroidCat 18:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Isn't that grossly POV editing? To judge a site to be a "watchdog site" is perfectly okay..... when sitting around drinking a beer with the boys. But not in an encyclopedic article. State the site as it appears to the reader or as it appears when called up, "Scientololgy vs Education" or something. But "watchdog site," that is original research, a conclusion drawn by the editor and posted to the article to sway the reader in a POV. I'm refering to the reference which proceeds: [1] Terryeo 14:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
A recent edit has Terryeo labeling studytech.org as a critical site. In light of his previous opinion 6 weeks ago that we should "let the dang site speak for itself", I find this new edit somewhat perplexing. If studytech.org is a "critical site" then I want to see a citation for that, because it appears that this classifaction by Terryeo is Original Research. Vivaldi 16:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
"and the Church of Spiritual Technology, that it cannot be regarded as being anything other than a Scientology subsidiary...... ". I paste it here because there is no citation which establishes that Applied Scholastics receives money or support in a physical way from the Church of Scientology. "subsidiary" means that in some manner, they receive some kind of ongoing support. Perhaps you meant something almost the same? In any event unless Applied Scholastics receives money or other real world goods its relationship as a "subsidiary" to the Church of Scientology isn't immediately obious and clear and would need to be supported with a verification. Terryeo 04:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Delphi Schools is a sub-stub that seems to have something to do with this group. The Tim Bowles article was the only article to link to Delphi Schools other than List of trademarks owned by the Church of Scientology and its affiliates. It states that Delphi Schools is somehow a part of Applied Scholastics. AKADriver 15:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Below are unevaluated sourced that may contain material to expand the article. -- Justallofthem ( talk) 00:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)Yes most of these look like good sources that should be incorporated into the article. Cirt ( talk) 08:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)Source for info to add to article. Cirt ( talk) 08:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Why criticize something that will only enable people to know how to LEARN? Educated individuals are essential and should be given every effective means possible to empower themselves and increase their own abilities and intelligence. I have to wonder about those who would object. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.18.105.2 ( talk) 22:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Why post something on an encyclopedia talk page that's unrelated to the article? Educated individuals are aware that Wikipedia is not a forum. I have to wonder about those who would use Wikipedia as such. 128.32.164.203 ( talk) 19:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
NPR ran a story on Morning Edition 3/27/13 [1] regarding the participation of Applied Scholastics in the Phoenix, AZ school district. Likely to be a lot of visits to this page as a result. 208.163.133.252 ( talk) 13:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
When something is reverted it would be nice to get a reason why it was reverted. Damotclese ( talk) 15:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
The text added just now suggests that Hubbard had "theories" about education, which is not correct. What he conjectured does not even remotely achieve the level of what constitutes a theory. Damotclese ( talk) 18:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Applied Scholastics. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Applied Scholastics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Applied Scholastics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This reads like a brochure. Definitely not neutral. Doesn't it violate the non-promotional rule? -- Vreejack 01:43, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
I believe the link is required, otherwise the text "although he occasionally claimed to have degrees in engineering or nuclear physics" could then be removed as uncited text. (I'm not sure how the opinion "smear site" is justified in this case. That does appear to be a scan and text of an actual CoS publication.) AndroidCat 18:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Isn't that grossly POV editing? To judge a site to be a "watchdog site" is perfectly okay..... when sitting around drinking a beer with the boys. But not in an encyclopedic article. State the site as it appears to the reader or as it appears when called up, "Scientololgy vs Education" or something. But "watchdog site," that is original research, a conclusion drawn by the editor and posted to the article to sway the reader in a POV. I'm refering to the reference which proceeds: [1] Terryeo 14:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
A recent edit has Terryeo labeling studytech.org as a critical site. In light of his previous opinion 6 weeks ago that we should "let the dang site speak for itself", I find this new edit somewhat perplexing. If studytech.org is a "critical site" then I want to see a citation for that, because it appears that this classifaction by Terryeo is Original Research. Vivaldi 16:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
"and the Church of Spiritual Technology, that it cannot be regarded as being anything other than a Scientology subsidiary...... ". I paste it here because there is no citation which establishes that Applied Scholastics receives money or support in a physical way from the Church of Scientology. "subsidiary" means that in some manner, they receive some kind of ongoing support. Perhaps you meant something almost the same? In any event unless Applied Scholastics receives money or other real world goods its relationship as a "subsidiary" to the Church of Scientology isn't immediately obious and clear and would need to be supported with a verification. Terryeo 04:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Delphi Schools is a sub-stub that seems to have something to do with this group. The Tim Bowles article was the only article to link to Delphi Schools other than List of trademarks owned by the Church of Scientology and its affiliates. It states that Delphi Schools is somehow a part of Applied Scholastics. AKADriver 15:34, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Below are unevaluated sourced that may contain material to expand the article. -- Justallofthem ( talk) 00:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)Yes most of these look like good sources that should be incorporated into the article. Cirt ( talk) 08:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)Source for info to add to article. Cirt ( talk) 08:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Why criticize something that will only enable people to know how to LEARN? Educated individuals are essential and should be given every effective means possible to empower themselves and increase their own abilities and intelligence. I have to wonder about those who would object. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.18.105.2 ( talk) 22:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Why post something on an encyclopedia talk page that's unrelated to the article? Educated individuals are aware that Wikipedia is not a forum. I have to wonder about those who would use Wikipedia as such. 128.32.164.203 ( talk) 19:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
NPR ran a story on Morning Edition 3/27/13 [1] regarding the participation of Applied Scholastics in the Phoenix, AZ school district. Likely to be a lot of visits to this page as a result. 208.163.133.252 ( talk) 13:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
When something is reverted it would be nice to get a reason why it was reverted. Damotclese ( talk) 15:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
The text added just now suggests that Hubbard had "theories" about education, which is not correct. What he conjectured does not even remotely achieve the level of what constitutes a theory. Damotclese ( talk) 18:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Applied Scholastics. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Applied Scholastics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Applied Scholastics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 19 May 2017 (UTC)