This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dear Administrator. Please, consider to update your bot, it should not attack links to scienticic journals.
Many articles have clickable references. Such a reference look nice, if they cite the existing article about the Journal. Wiki should have links to all such per-reviewed scientific journals; perhapos, even proceedengs. The publications in such journals are very important source of information for Wiki.
If a user looks for a specific journal, we should not foce him to use other databases, where on the request "Journal of Physics B" the user is offered something like
Discount rate for any Journal of Physics B you like, and much more! (commertial link)
Choose your Journal of Physics B, new or used; discount prides! (commertical link)
Sell your Journal of Physics B, best management! (commercial link)
Sincerely, dima 03:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Two things I would like to point out:
AS such, this article, as I see it, has little to no purpose. As of the writing of this comment, there are 1,653,609 articles in Wikipedia. If every website and magazine were given an article, this number would skyrocket, and the overall quality of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia would plummet. Wikipedia is trying to be an encyclopedia of all things noteworthy, not a catalog of all things. This article seems more like a catalog entry than an encyclopedia article. If you can expand it to the point of notability than be my guest, elsewise this article should be deleted. Wikipedia is not a search engine. This info (and more, could be found in Google, without clicking any of the links. (By the way, please don't take any offense at what I say, I am simply speaking the way I enterpret wikipedia's policy and guidelines.-- Vox Rationis 04:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dear Administrator. Please, consider to update your bot, it should not attack links to scienticic journals.
Many articles have clickable references. Such a reference look nice, if they cite the existing article about the Journal. Wiki should have links to all such per-reviewed scientific journals; perhapos, even proceedengs. The publications in such journals are very important source of information for Wiki.
If a user looks for a specific journal, we should not foce him to use other databases, where on the request "Journal of Physics B" the user is offered something like
Discount rate for any Journal of Physics B you like, and much more! (commertial link)
Choose your Journal of Physics B, new or used; discount prides! (commertical link)
Sell your Journal of Physics B, best management! (commercial link)
Sincerely, dima 03:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Two things I would like to point out:
AS such, this article, as I see it, has little to no purpose. As of the writing of this comment, there are 1,653,609 articles in Wikipedia. If every website and magazine were given an article, this number would skyrocket, and the overall quality of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia would plummet. Wikipedia is trying to be an encyclopedia of all things noteworthy, not a catalog of all things. This article seems more like a catalog entry than an encyclopedia article. If you can expand it to the point of notability than be my guest, elsewise this article should be deleted. Wikipedia is not a search engine. This info (and more, could be found in Google, without clicking any of the links. (By the way, please don't take any offense at what I say, I am simply speaking the way I enterpret wikipedia's policy and guidelines.-- Vox Rationis 04:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)