![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The High Huts section is getting pretty long, and has huge possibilities for expansion (system's history as a whole, images, maybe bios on important figures like Joe Dodge, etc...). Maybe it could be split to its own page ( High Huts of the White Mountains? Appalachian Mountain Club Huts?), becuase right now the TOC looks kind of shabby what with two sections but 8 or 9 subheadings in the High Huts section. There's a chance it will look better with more material added (I plan to put in some stuff about the visitors centers, whatever else i can find), and maybe it just doesn't warrant a split. But that's how i feel on the issue. The page itself isn't too long, per se, but it just seems to be dominated by the High Huts material. Thoughts? jfg284 17:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:Amc solo logo.svg, found on Appalachian Mountain Club, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI ( talk) 02:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
The infobox on this article is currently an example of what they should not be - it's a enormous grab-bag of anything editors could find that may or may not be relevant to readers, full of unnecessary tidbits (Tax ID number?!?!) and material that's not in the article, like revenue from four years ago. WP:infobox says: "The purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article (an article should remain complete with its summary infobox ignored, with exceptions noted below). The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance."
It needs to be slashed, with some material moved into the article. - DavidWBrooks ( talk) 13:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The High Huts section is getting pretty long, and has huge possibilities for expansion (system's history as a whole, images, maybe bios on important figures like Joe Dodge, etc...). Maybe it could be split to its own page ( High Huts of the White Mountains? Appalachian Mountain Club Huts?), becuase right now the TOC looks kind of shabby what with two sections but 8 or 9 subheadings in the High Huts section. There's a chance it will look better with more material added (I plan to put in some stuff about the visitors centers, whatever else i can find), and maybe it just doesn't warrant a split. But that's how i feel on the issue. The page itself isn't too long, per se, but it just seems to be dominated by the High Huts material. Thoughts? jfg284 17:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:Amc solo logo.svg, found on Appalachian Mountain Club, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI ( talk) 02:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
The infobox on this article is currently an example of what they should not be - it's a enormous grab-bag of anything editors could find that may or may not be relevant to readers, full of unnecessary tidbits (Tax ID number?!?!) and material that's not in the article, like revenue from four years ago. WP:infobox says: "The purpose of an infobox: to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article (an article should remain complete with its summary infobox ignored, with exceptions noted below). The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance."
It needs to be slashed, with some material moved into the article. - DavidWBrooks ( talk) 13:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)