![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Appalachia (Mesozoic)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "LoneStarPterosaurs":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
I have called question on this claim as I've never heard this argument on any scientific papers on the dinosaurs of Appalachia, the claim was intially unreferenced. It appears to be a violation of Wikipedia:No original research policy. The reason that is primarily given for the lack of Appalachian dinosaurs is that there was little sediment input into the eastern half of the western interior seaway due to a largely flat topograpy in comparison to Laramidia, meaning that most coastal sediments were marine. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 00:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
The current name seems a bit esoteric for most readers. How about Appalachia (landmass) or Appalachia (Mesozoic landmass) ? FunkMonk ( talk) 21:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
I agree with landmass, simple and to the point Hemiauchenia ( talk) 22:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved b uidh e 10:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Appalachia (Mesozoic) →
Appalachia (landmass) – Less esoteric, more to the point.
FunkMonk (
talk) 23:23, 10 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting.
b
uidh
e
20:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Appalachia (Mesozoic)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "LoneStarPterosaurs":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
I have called question on this claim as I've never heard this argument on any scientific papers on the dinosaurs of Appalachia, the claim was intially unreferenced. It appears to be a violation of Wikipedia:No original research policy. The reason that is primarily given for the lack of Appalachian dinosaurs is that there was little sediment input into the eastern half of the western interior seaway due to a largely flat topograpy in comparison to Laramidia, meaning that most coastal sediments were marine. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 00:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
The current name seems a bit esoteric for most readers. How about Appalachia (landmass) or Appalachia (Mesozoic landmass) ? FunkMonk ( talk) 21:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
I agree with landmass, simple and to the point Hemiauchenia ( talk) 22:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved b uidh e 10:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Appalachia (Mesozoic) →
Appalachia (landmass) – Less esoteric, more to the point.
FunkMonk (
talk) 23:23, 10 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting.
b
uidh
e
20:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)