GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: SurenGrig07 ( talk · contribs) 16:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Concerning the previous article, pending a complete investigation concerning the internal minutiae of the article and the correction. of all minor error, which, upon an immediately cursory glance, do not appear to remain particularly prominent, I believe that the article qualifies for selection as a Good Article; this primarily results from its satisfactory fulfilment of the entirety of the associated criteria necessary for good article status. With regards to the first criterion, the article possesses particularly correct prose, with an absence of grammatical errors or sentences which must remain subject to basic or intermediate copy editing from the large majority of the article; the article possesses a structure which satisfies the guidelines established within the Manual of Style concerning layout. When viewing the adequacy of the article from the perspective of the second criterion, the article contains, when viewed cursorily, an apparent absence of original research or plagiarism; all citations within the article correspond to the guidelines of the Manual of Style and the citation format remains organised within a clear and elucidatory manner. The article remains broad within its coverage, addressing numerous aspects of the culture, history, geography, economy and culture of the Prefecture; for a potential future promotion within status, I would primarily recommend expansion of the Climate, Dialects and Symbols and Names sections. The article remains neutral, perhaps assisted via an apparent lack of controversy concerning the nature of the article; regardless, the criterion remains satisfied. A viewing of the edit history of the article dispels potential fears of an edit war; contributions remain entirely stable and constructive. Lastly, the images within the article provide exceptional support to the content; no apparent copyright violations exist within the article. Thus, I would like to announce my support for the selection of this article as a Good Article; thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SurenGrig07 (
talk •
contribs)
19:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, per this discussion I will be completing a more thorough review with the GA criteria. I'll also bullet my comments. Thanks, Kingsif ( talk) 12:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Aomori Prefecture hosted the 2003 Asian Winter Games.is not suitable coverage of this
On 20 February 2018 a U.S. Air Force F-16 fighter jet caught fire in flight. The pilot dumped two fuel tanks into Lake Ogawara in eastern Aomori Prefecture.has been removed entirely; you're right that it's not very relevant in the military section, but has it had an effect on the area's ecology? Kingsif ( talk) 14:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Kingsif: Hey again, I think I've addressed the concerns you laid out above. I'd appreciate feedback on anything else that can be done to help solidify the article's GA status or if it can be retained based on its current state. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 03:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Mccunicano, Kingsif, where does this review stand? Nothing has been posted here for over three weeks, and it's been over two weeks since Mccunicano made any significant edits to the article, though they have been quite active elsewhere on Wikipedia since then. Can we get this wrapped up soon? Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 21:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: SurenGrig07 ( talk · contribs) 16:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Concerning the previous article, pending a complete investigation concerning the internal minutiae of the article and the correction. of all minor error, which, upon an immediately cursory glance, do not appear to remain particularly prominent, I believe that the article qualifies for selection as a Good Article; this primarily results from its satisfactory fulfilment of the entirety of the associated criteria necessary for good article status. With regards to the first criterion, the article possesses particularly correct prose, with an absence of grammatical errors or sentences which must remain subject to basic or intermediate copy editing from the large majority of the article; the article possesses a structure which satisfies the guidelines established within the Manual of Style concerning layout. When viewing the adequacy of the article from the perspective of the second criterion, the article contains, when viewed cursorily, an apparent absence of original research or plagiarism; all citations within the article correspond to the guidelines of the Manual of Style and the citation format remains organised within a clear and elucidatory manner. The article remains broad within its coverage, addressing numerous aspects of the culture, history, geography, economy and culture of the Prefecture; for a potential future promotion within status, I would primarily recommend expansion of the Climate, Dialects and Symbols and Names sections. The article remains neutral, perhaps assisted via an apparent lack of controversy concerning the nature of the article; regardless, the criterion remains satisfied. A viewing of the edit history of the article dispels potential fears of an edit war; contributions remain entirely stable and constructive. Lastly, the images within the article provide exceptional support to the content; no apparent copyright violations exist within the article. Thus, I would like to announce my support for the selection of this article as a Good Article; thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SurenGrig07 (
talk •
contribs)
19:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, per this discussion I will be completing a more thorough review with the GA criteria. I'll also bullet my comments. Thanks, Kingsif ( talk) 12:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Aomori Prefecture hosted the 2003 Asian Winter Games.is not suitable coverage of this
On 20 February 2018 a U.S. Air Force F-16 fighter jet caught fire in flight. The pilot dumped two fuel tanks into Lake Ogawara in eastern Aomori Prefecture.has been removed entirely; you're right that it's not very relevant in the military section, but has it had an effect on the area's ecology? Kingsif ( talk) 14:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Kingsif: Hey again, I think I've addressed the concerns you laid out above. I'd appreciate feedback on anything else that can be done to help solidify the article's GA status or if it can be retained based on its current state. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 03:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Mccunicano, Kingsif, where does this review stand? Nothing has been posted here for over three weeks, and it's been over two weeks since Mccunicano made any significant edits to the article, though they have been quite active elsewhere on Wikipedia since then. Can we get this wrapped up soon? Thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 21:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)