This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article is now worse then when I put in a clean up request. The grammatical and compositional errors have been left in, and a great many subsection titles added, which in such a short article is visually unappealing and serves only to distract the reader. I did not do the clean up myself because I had been reading articles on Roman history and had become too immured in a jumble of information, dates, persons etc so I wanted a fresh outside perspective to tackle the problem. I will attempt it in a week or so. -- AladdinSE 10:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Can anyone explain what this, PIR2 A 885, mean? Mariule 12:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
The entire section seems to read as if from graves's novel i, claudius which is fiction. but i don't want to blank the the article, if anybody has a better idea please tell me otherwise in a few days i'll blank it and just redirect it to the Claudius page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tca achintya ( talk • contribs) 11:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The article was assessed C-class, for lack of in-line citations. Boneyard90 ( talk) 16:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Number 5 7 12:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Antonia Minor → Antonia the Younger – It's all for consistency. Many Roman women's main pages in Wikipedia are referred as "the Elder" and "the Younger" when their Latin names were "Maior/Major" and "Minor" respectively. Thắng L.Đ.Q. ( talk) 15:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Antonia Minor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.asn-ibk.ac.at/bildung/faecher/geschichte/maike/bilderkatalog_antike/julischclaudisch/antike3-047.jpg{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.sfiic.org/images/event/antonia%20minor.jpgWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article is now worse then when I put in a clean up request. The grammatical and compositional errors have been left in, and a great many subsection titles added, which in such a short article is visually unappealing and serves only to distract the reader. I did not do the clean up myself because I had been reading articles on Roman history and had become too immured in a jumble of information, dates, persons etc so I wanted a fresh outside perspective to tackle the problem. I will attempt it in a week or so. -- AladdinSE 10:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Can anyone explain what this, PIR2 A 885, mean? Mariule 12:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
The entire section seems to read as if from graves's novel i, claudius which is fiction. but i don't want to blank the the article, if anybody has a better idea please tell me otherwise in a few days i'll blank it and just redirect it to the Claudius page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tca achintya ( talk • contribs) 11:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The article was assessed C-class, for lack of in-line citations. Boneyard90 ( talk) 16:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Number 5 7 12:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Antonia Minor → Antonia the Younger – It's all for consistency. Many Roman women's main pages in Wikipedia are referred as "the Elder" and "the Younger" when their Latin names were "Maior/Major" and "Minor" respectively. Thắng L.Đ.Q. ( talk) 15:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Antonia Minor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.asn-ibk.ac.at/bildung/faecher/geschichte/maike/bilderkatalog_antike/julischclaudisch/antike3-047.jpg{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.sfiic.org/images/event/antonia%20minor.jpgWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)