This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Anton Chekhov article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 730 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Anton Chekhov is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 11, 2007. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in a non-specific variant of English that cannot be identified as e.g. American or British English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus or national ties with the subject. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anton Chekhov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Just saying in case anyone is interested. Mr Fantastic Knowledge ( talk) 16:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
I found a very awkward & unworkable mix of explanatory footnotes treated as ref tags & what is essentially parenthetical referencing without the parentheses mixed in. The latter should really be shortened footnotes, but you cannot put {{ sfn}} wishing ref tags. However, you can put {{ sfn}} with the explanatory footnote template, {{ sfn}}.
I am going to convert the ref tags that are really explanatory footnotes to {{ efn}} & {{ notelist}} as per WP:CITEVAR:
imposing one style on an article with inconsistent citation styles (e.g., some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references): an improvement because it makes the citations easier to understand and edit;
fixing errors in citation coding, including incorrectly used template parameters, and <ref>
markup problems: an improvement because it helps the citations to be parsed correctly;
Peaceray ( talk) 05:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This edit [6]:
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Anton Chekhov article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 730 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Anton Chekhov is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 11, 2007. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in a non-specific variant of English that cannot be identified as e.g. American or British English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus or national ties with the subject. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anton Chekhov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Just saying in case anyone is interested. Mr Fantastic Knowledge ( talk) 16:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
I found a very awkward & unworkable mix of explanatory footnotes treated as ref tags & what is essentially parenthetical referencing without the parentheses mixed in. The latter should really be shortened footnotes, but you cannot put {{ sfn}} wishing ref tags. However, you can put {{ sfn}} with the explanatory footnote template, {{ sfn}}.
I am going to convert the ref tags that are really explanatory footnotes to {{ efn}} & {{ notelist}} as per WP:CITEVAR:
imposing one style on an article with inconsistent citation styles (e.g., some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references): an improvement because it makes the citations easier to understand and edit;
fixing errors in citation coding, including incorrectly used template parameters, and <ref>
markup problems: an improvement because it helps the citations to be parsed correctly;
Peaceray ( talk) 05:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This edit [6]: