![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
I'm going to add citation needed templates to some of the entries. Why? Because we aren't interested in listing merely shows with similar content - we're listing international versions of Antiques Roadshow specifically as opposed to "shows generally about appraising old stuff". In other words, unless a show can be shown to be in some relation to the subject of this article, it should get off the page. Cheers, CapnZapp ( talk) 06:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
I added a template to the entire "International versions" section.
Do note: I'm not calling for sources that merely verify the existence of each show. I'm specifically calling for sources that verify the link to the subject of this article: BBC's Antiques Roadshow.
In other words, let's avoid turning the section into a linkfarm for any old show where people evaluate their stuff. Inclusion in the section means we claim "NN is an international version of AR". I now call for sources that verify this connection. Regards CapnZapp ( talk) 10:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Just creating this talk section for discussing such a major change. CapnZapp ( talk) 10:14, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Antiques experts and appraisers: is this list trying to be complete (e.g. "all experts during 2000-2018"), or is it trying to denote notability ("Among the best known..."). It can't do both - in that case the list should attempt completeness, and text should be used to introduce the "main" ones.
I was intrigued why someone like Mould wasn't included - maybe he quit or was let go or something. So I googled "philip mould site:bbc.co.uk" and sure enough, he's still there - there is an AR presentation page for him as well: [1]
It's just not linked to from that "meet the team" page.
He IS however, that page tells me, on a page called "the experts", a very similar-looking index which stretches to two pages (Mould is on page 2): [2]
Now the question remains: which of these sources can be used to establish they're on the team right now which is what we are claiming with our current section title? None of them mention a year or season, as far as I can tell.
And forestalling one possible suggestion: no, we can't just drop the "for 2019" bit, because then we're right back into "here's a random group of experts with no good selection criteria" territory - the only reason some are in and others aren't is because BBC selected them, or just goofed up. Which I don't think makes for good encyclopedic value.
Remember, we should either strive for completeness "every face that has appeared even once during forty years" or we need to tell our readers what our inclusion criteria is ("Some guys except maybe not those BBC forgot about" wouldn't be my top choice :-)
CapnZapp ( talk) 10:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
My parents have passed and I have inherited a number of pieces to include. Crystal pedestal bowl w hanging crystals and wondering if this has any value 2600:1702:32C0:6DF0:404F:67DC:5828:A6E3 ( talk) 12:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
What is a bottle like this circa 1978 worth 2600:6C5E:597F:CBFF:76:C5F7:5128:F5E0 ( talk) 02:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
I'm going to add citation needed templates to some of the entries. Why? Because we aren't interested in listing merely shows with similar content - we're listing international versions of Antiques Roadshow specifically as opposed to "shows generally about appraising old stuff". In other words, unless a show can be shown to be in some relation to the subject of this article, it should get off the page. Cheers, CapnZapp ( talk) 06:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
I added a template to the entire "International versions" section.
Do note: I'm not calling for sources that merely verify the existence of each show. I'm specifically calling for sources that verify the link to the subject of this article: BBC's Antiques Roadshow.
In other words, let's avoid turning the section into a linkfarm for any old show where people evaluate their stuff. Inclusion in the section means we claim "NN is an international version of AR". I now call for sources that verify this connection. Regards CapnZapp ( talk) 10:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Just creating this talk section for discussing such a major change. CapnZapp ( talk) 10:14, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Antiques experts and appraisers: is this list trying to be complete (e.g. "all experts during 2000-2018"), or is it trying to denote notability ("Among the best known..."). It can't do both - in that case the list should attempt completeness, and text should be used to introduce the "main" ones.
I was intrigued why someone like Mould wasn't included - maybe he quit or was let go or something. So I googled "philip mould site:bbc.co.uk" and sure enough, he's still there - there is an AR presentation page for him as well: [1]
It's just not linked to from that "meet the team" page.
He IS however, that page tells me, on a page called "the experts", a very similar-looking index which stretches to two pages (Mould is on page 2): [2]
Now the question remains: which of these sources can be used to establish they're on the team right now which is what we are claiming with our current section title? None of them mention a year or season, as far as I can tell.
And forestalling one possible suggestion: no, we can't just drop the "for 2019" bit, because then we're right back into "here's a random group of experts with no good selection criteria" territory - the only reason some are in and others aren't is because BBC selected them, or just goofed up. Which I don't think makes for good encyclopedic value.
Remember, we should either strive for completeness "every face that has appeared even once during forty years" or we need to tell our readers what our inclusion criteria is ("Some guys except maybe not those BBC forgot about" wouldn't be my top choice :-)
CapnZapp ( talk) 10:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
My parents have passed and I have inherited a number of pieces to include. Crystal pedestal bowl w hanging crystals and wondering if this has any value 2600:1702:32C0:6DF0:404F:67DC:5828:A6E3 ( talk) 12:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
What is a bottle like this circa 1978 worth 2600:6C5E:597F:CBFF:76:C5F7:5128:F5E0 ( talk) 02:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)