![]() | Antiparallelogram has been listed as one of the Mathematics good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wait, I translated a part of this article, some expert translator will translate from the article name that first appeared on any Wikipedias. A part of the article is translated, more will continue later. -- Pumpie 19:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Is this figure possible?? Show me a picture. Georgia guy 00:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
The definition here states that "the two longest sides cross each other instead of being parallel". Why is there a requirement that the longest sides (instead of the two shorter sides) have to cross?
In all of the citations in the references section, the definitions found there have no mention of this. I think it should be removed.
-- Mordomo ( talk) 23:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Elli ( talk · contribs) 14:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Article is in decent shape. Going to go section-by-section with the review here. Elli ( talk | contribs) 14:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The four midpoints of its sides lie on a line perpendicular to the axis of symmetry; that is, for this kind of quadrilateral, the Varignon parallelogram is a degenerate quadrilateral consisting of four collinear points.the second part of this sentence isn't in the source, but I guess can be reasonably inferred from the definition of a Varignon parallelogram. Would be better to have a reference here though.
I think the De Villiers reference, based off of the title, might be usable for the second paragraph? Elli ( talk | contribs) 14:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
01:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by David Eppstein ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC).
![]() | Antiparallelogram has been listed as one of the Mathematics good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wait, I translated a part of this article, some expert translator will translate from the article name that first appeared on any Wikipedias. A part of the article is translated, more will continue later. -- Pumpie 19:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Is this figure possible?? Show me a picture. Georgia guy 00:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
The definition here states that "the two longest sides cross each other instead of being parallel". Why is there a requirement that the longest sides (instead of the two shorter sides) have to cross?
In all of the citations in the references section, the definitions found there have no mention of this. I think it should be removed.
-- Mordomo ( talk) 23:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Elli ( talk · contribs) 14:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Article is in decent shape. Going to go section-by-section with the review here. Elli ( talk | contribs) 14:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The four midpoints of its sides lie on a line perpendicular to the axis of symmetry; that is, for this kind of quadrilateral, the Varignon parallelogram is a degenerate quadrilateral consisting of four collinear points.the second part of this sentence isn't in the source, but I guess can be reasonably inferred from the definition of a Varignon parallelogram. Would be better to have a reference here though.
I think the De Villiers reference, based off of the title, might be usable for the second paragraph? Elli ( talk | contribs) 14:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
01:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by David Eppstein ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC).