This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Anti-French sentiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 91.5 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 91.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Francophobia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
There's a proposal to blow up the article Anti-French sentiment in the United States, and start over. Your feedback would be welcome at this discussion. Thank you. Mathglot ( talk) 01:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
In this threat to start an edit war, MarioSuperstar77 seems to feel that he can simply add a trivial instance of anti-French sentiment with one source and have it qualify for a article with an incredibly broad scope. I maintain that this is trivia and 100% WP:UNDUE. Since he's already threatening to start edit-warring over it, I thought I would attempt to head that off with a discussion here. Cheers. Benicio2020 ( talk) 23:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Benicio2020:and you are going to see other editors tell you that you are wrong, and you are going to listen to them, is this supposed to be a struggle session? For real, calm down, what's your problem? You're being so antagonizing for no good reason. MarioSuperstar77 ( talk) 16:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
unfrequently the target of either mockery or vicious criticism. I agree with Mathglot above--just because it's reported by a reputable source does not automatically qualify its inclusion into an encyclopedia article. EDIT: forgot signature -- PerpetuityGrat ( talk) 13:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The "1.1.1 Britain" section was a little hard to follow as it was. I made a few edits that are about using more accessible language and providing some extra historical context I believe is necessary for those with no knowledge of English history. Nxavar ( talk) 10:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Six weeks doesn"t make a months . This statment are false and fuel the francophobia and hide the retreat of Dunkirk who played a massive role in the surrender of France . 2A01:CB00:456:9C00:4C86:BAB:5A72:BAD4 ( talk) 10:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Anti-French sentiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 91.5 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 91.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Francophobia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
There's a proposal to blow up the article Anti-French sentiment in the United States, and start over. Your feedback would be welcome at this discussion. Thank you. Mathglot ( talk) 01:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
In this threat to start an edit war, MarioSuperstar77 seems to feel that he can simply add a trivial instance of anti-French sentiment with one source and have it qualify for a article with an incredibly broad scope. I maintain that this is trivia and 100% WP:UNDUE. Since he's already threatening to start edit-warring over it, I thought I would attempt to head that off with a discussion here. Cheers. Benicio2020 ( talk) 23:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Benicio2020:and you are going to see other editors tell you that you are wrong, and you are going to listen to them, is this supposed to be a struggle session? For real, calm down, what's your problem? You're being so antagonizing for no good reason. MarioSuperstar77 ( talk) 16:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
unfrequently the target of either mockery or vicious criticism. I agree with Mathglot above--just because it's reported by a reputable source does not automatically qualify its inclusion into an encyclopedia article. EDIT: forgot signature -- PerpetuityGrat ( talk) 13:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The "1.1.1 Britain" section was a little hard to follow as it was. I made a few edits that are about using more accessible language and providing some extra historical context I believe is necessary for those with no knowledge of English history. Nxavar ( talk) 10:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Six weeks doesn"t make a months . This statment are false and fuel the francophobia and hide the retreat of Dunkirk who played a massive role in the surrender of France . 2A01:CB00:456:9C00:4C86:BAB:5A72:BAD4 ( talk) 10:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)