The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Anti-Corruption Bureau (Maharashtra) per Necrothesp's citation of WP policy  —  Amakuru ( talk) 21:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply

• Anti Corruption Bureau, Maharashtra → Anti-Corruption Bureau, Maharashtra
• Anti-Corruption Bureau (Argentina) → Anti-Corruption Bureau, Argentina

– Maharashtra as in sources [1] [2]; convert redirect Anti-Corruption Bureau to be a disambiguation as the target National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine is not referred to by "Anti-Corruption Bureau" in the sources [3]; move Argentina to be have consistent dab. — DaxServer ( talk) 11:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply

• Support per nom. There's no WP:PTOPIC for "Anti-Corruption Bureau." -- Ab207 ( talk) 16:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC) reply
• Oppose. Move to Anti-Corruption Bureau (Maharashtra). Parenthetical disambiguation by country is standard for organisations, so this is what would be consistent with other articles throughout Wikipedia. Support creation of dabpage. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC) reply

  @ Necrothesp Here Maharashtra is a state and not a country. Does it still apply for states? In that case the article Anti-Corruption Bureau, Andhra Pradesh shall also be moved to Anti-Corruption Bureau (Andhra Pradesh) — DaxServer ( talk · contribs) 09:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply

  Same thing in this case. Indeed it should. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply