 | Text and/or other creative content from Anthony Hall (Buckinghamshire) was copied or moved into Aston Clinton with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
After a year and 2 months this page has 24 edits and 24 words in the article (if I count 2011 & 2009 as 1 word each). Perhaps a merger with Aston Clinton would be the best place for this artical. After all the AC article doesn't even mention this house, execpt for a picture of Anthony Hall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peacekeeper 1234 ( talk • contribs) 15:33, 03 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message on my talk page Peacekeeper 1234. I personally have no idea why my speedy nomination was declined on this one, as the article is way too short to be an article, is not a valid stub, and does nothing but define the page-title (i.e. fails WP:NAD). I can only assume that the declining admin did not browse the edit history to see that nearly all previous content had been stripped away as invalid. If the article was going to be anything more than a definition, I'm sure that would have happened by now. I'd fully support your proposed merge, but find it somewhat amusing that we're left referring to an eleven word minor edit as "merging" ;). Regardless, I'd be happy to see it toasted one way or the other, simply because it's only bringing down the quality of the project in its current state. -- WikHead ( talk) 16:43, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Actioned this non consequential 'merger'. Tmol42 ( talk) 00:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
| Text and/or other creative content from Anthony Hall (Buckinghamshire) was copied or moved into Aston Clinton with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
After a year and 2 months this page has 24 edits and 24 words in the article (if I count 2011 & 2009 as 1 word each). Perhaps a merger with Aston Clinton would be the best place for this artical. After all the AC article doesn't even mention this house, execpt for a picture of Anthony Hall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peacekeeper 1234 ( talk • contribs) 15:33, 03 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message on my talk page Peacekeeper 1234. I personally have no idea why my speedy nomination was declined on this one, as the article is way too short to be an article, is not a valid stub, and does nothing but define the page-title (i.e. fails WP:NAD). I can only assume that the declining admin did not browse the edit history to see that nearly all previous content had been stripped away as invalid. If the article was going to be anything more than a definition, I'm sure that would have happened by now. I'd fully support your proposed merge, but find it somewhat amusing that we're left referring to an eleven word minor edit as "merging" ;). Regardless, I'd be happy to see it toasted one way or the other, simply because it's only bringing down the quality of the project in its current state. -- WikHead ( talk) 16:43, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Actioned this non consequential 'merger'. Tmol42 ( talk) 00:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)