This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Annihilator (ring theory) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Annihilators in ring theory and linear algebra need separate treatments I think. Geometry guy 00:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Please indicate which sections are the most confusing, thanks :) Rschwieb ( talk) 01:41, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
what the heck happened here?!?! 70.171.155.43 ( talk) 20:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Here is the first lie excised from the article:
This is the second one, a false proof of the first:
Hence the annihilator of is just . 70.171.155.43 ( talk) 20:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Annihilator (ring theory) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Annihilators in ring theory and linear algebra need separate treatments I think. Geometry guy 00:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Please indicate which sections are the most confusing, thanks :) Rschwieb ( talk) 01:41, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
what the heck happened here?!?! 70.171.155.43 ( talk) 20:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Here is the first lie excised from the article:
This is the second one, a false proof of the first:
Hence the annihilator of is just . 70.171.155.43 ( talk) 20:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)