![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 November 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am a student at the University of hull and for a project we are doing I will be creating a page on this shortly.-- Vickxi ( talk) 11:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Annabeth Robinson is a multi-media artist and lecturer based in Leeds. -- cmchristmas ( talk) 13:23, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
WP:RS and WP:GNG for starters. Whatever your project is, you are subject to Wikipedia's rules here, not those of your tutor or whoever suggested this. Read those policies, and contact me if you have queries. Peridon ( talk) 22:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
I have created a page on Annabeth Robinson(Before I was aware the above people were about to do it) Im also a student at the University of Hull and have been asked to choose a practitioner to put on the website and thus is for academic purposes and the biography will be adjusted and expanded on shortly ( JR ( talk) 22:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by JReeve89 ( talk • contribs)
While I think notability is highly questionable, she does get 7 Google Scholar hits and that seems to be enough to preclude speedy deletion. I think this one may well end up at AfD. --
DanielRigal (
talk)
23:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Academic assignments to add articles to Wikipedia are fully accepted here, and can be excellent things. There are even such project sponsored by the foundation, and many universities and schools have participated. I do not see how this can in any sense by called meatpuppetry. for a description of some of what we do here, see Wikipedia:School and university projects and WP:Schools FAQ .
In general I regard biographies as exactly the right type of articles to begin with. I've advised several projects of this sort, and that's what I always suggest, either for a short project by itself, of as an initial exercise. Naturally, the students need advice, and that's why we have projects to help them and their instructors. The obvious advice is to start with subjects who are very surely notable , and to collect sources first, before actually writing. It is not at all difficult to teach the mechanics of editing Wikipedia, The judgement for selecting article topics can be substantially more difficult, and I--and many experienced editors--am very ready to take a look at prospective topics and make suggestions. I commend any teacher who decides to do such a project, but suggest that they ask for some guidance--and ask first, before the students run into difficulties. Please ask your teacher to get in touch with me or--even better any of the UK wikipedians. DGG ( talk ) 02:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
In view of the above I have declined the speedy nomination (though not criticising the nominator - it was a reasonable A7 nomination), and explained about notability on the author's talk page. JohnCD ( talk) 11:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Please read WP:RS to see what sorts of references are good and what are not. Linkedin is no good at all. Please replace the Linkedin references with reliable, independent references. Books and other scholarly references are best. News coverage is also OK. Blogs and self published material is no good. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 20:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-- FrederickJPorteer ( talk) 16:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi everybody. Please bear the following in mind:
-- DanielRigal ( talk) 21:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
It seems that the original authors have gone and nobody was very keen on the article at AfD. Nobody objected to my suggestion that we stub it so I will be gutting out all the trivia and unverifiable material. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 22:40, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi there guys. I'd just like to introduce myself and my colleague, User:Katie.lydon who will be working on improving and expanding this page. We, like vicki, are doing this for a class. However, we hope to make a much better job of it and create an article that is going to stay.
We're new users so any help would be appreciated. For the past week we have been researching and editing the article in our sandboxes. Hopefully we can give Annabeth Robinson the page that she deserves. -- FrederickJPorter ( talk) 09:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey Friend! That looks good, we will have to chop it down a bit as it's a bit long. I'm having a bit of luck finding stuff on google scholar. Just reading about her whiteboard and her new 'handsUp' chair that she created. Really done a lot. It's a wonder how her notability was questioned.-- FrederickJPorter ( talk) 09:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello people of Wikipedia! I have a quick question. I am trying to reference something I saw in Second Life in reference to Annabeth Robinson. How do I go about doing that? My guess is a web source but just wanted to make sure! Also, this will be needed for my new piece of written work in here so please don't delete it! Muchos gracias and I look forward to hearing from you soon Katie.lydon ( talk) 16:59, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
So I've read the notability guidelines and I have to admit that according to them, Robinson might indeed not be notable enough to be on Wikipedia. It'd be a shame to see the article go. I have wittled down the references just six. Three of which give moderate coverage of Robinson and the other three which give very little coverage.
I'm not sure whether this is enough for the article's subject to be considered notable. Obviously for me, and the people studying my course, she's incredibly notable. But wikipedia's standards are much more stringent.
So, let the discussion commence over whether she should be kept.
Also, other issues I think have been fixed, let me know what you all think on that side.
FrederickJPorter ( talk) 21:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm quite interested to know what people think about this article and the improvements made. I'm gonna put a tag here so that people will start visiting the page and I can get help deciding if I should keep this page. I really want to know whether the page will be kept or not and whether I can still improve it because it is playing on my mind that it's not properly finished. Thanks FrederickJPorter ( talk) 16:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Frederick, what do think are the two or three best reliable, independent sources that give her significant coverage? A careful reading of those sources determines whether she is notable by Wikipedia standards. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Annabeth Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 November 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am a student at the University of hull and for a project we are doing I will be creating a page on this shortly.-- Vickxi ( talk) 11:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Annabeth Robinson is a multi-media artist and lecturer based in Leeds. -- cmchristmas ( talk) 13:23, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
WP:RS and WP:GNG for starters. Whatever your project is, you are subject to Wikipedia's rules here, not those of your tutor or whoever suggested this. Read those policies, and contact me if you have queries. Peridon ( talk) 22:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
I have created a page on Annabeth Robinson(Before I was aware the above people were about to do it) Im also a student at the University of Hull and have been asked to choose a practitioner to put on the website and thus is for academic purposes and the biography will be adjusted and expanded on shortly ( JR ( talk) 22:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by JReeve89 ( talk • contribs)
While I think notability is highly questionable, she does get 7 Google Scholar hits and that seems to be enough to preclude speedy deletion. I think this one may well end up at AfD. --
DanielRigal (
talk)
23:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Academic assignments to add articles to Wikipedia are fully accepted here, and can be excellent things. There are even such project sponsored by the foundation, and many universities and schools have participated. I do not see how this can in any sense by called meatpuppetry. for a description of some of what we do here, see Wikipedia:School and university projects and WP:Schools FAQ .
In general I regard biographies as exactly the right type of articles to begin with. I've advised several projects of this sort, and that's what I always suggest, either for a short project by itself, of as an initial exercise. Naturally, the students need advice, and that's why we have projects to help them and their instructors. The obvious advice is to start with subjects who are very surely notable , and to collect sources first, before actually writing. It is not at all difficult to teach the mechanics of editing Wikipedia, The judgement for selecting article topics can be substantially more difficult, and I--and many experienced editors--am very ready to take a look at prospective topics and make suggestions. I commend any teacher who decides to do such a project, but suggest that they ask for some guidance--and ask first, before the students run into difficulties. Please ask your teacher to get in touch with me or--even better any of the UK wikipedians. DGG ( talk ) 02:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
In view of the above I have declined the speedy nomination (though not criticising the nominator - it was a reasonable A7 nomination), and explained about notability on the author's talk page. JohnCD ( talk) 11:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Please read WP:RS to see what sorts of references are good and what are not. Linkedin is no good at all. Please replace the Linkedin references with reliable, independent references. Books and other scholarly references are best. News coverage is also OK. Blogs and self published material is no good. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 20:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-- FrederickJPorteer ( talk) 16:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi everybody. Please bear the following in mind:
-- DanielRigal ( talk) 21:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
It seems that the original authors have gone and nobody was very keen on the article at AfD. Nobody objected to my suggestion that we stub it so I will be gutting out all the trivia and unverifiable material. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 22:40, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi there guys. I'd just like to introduce myself and my colleague, User:Katie.lydon who will be working on improving and expanding this page. We, like vicki, are doing this for a class. However, we hope to make a much better job of it and create an article that is going to stay.
We're new users so any help would be appreciated. For the past week we have been researching and editing the article in our sandboxes. Hopefully we can give Annabeth Robinson the page that she deserves. -- FrederickJPorter ( talk) 09:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey Friend! That looks good, we will have to chop it down a bit as it's a bit long. I'm having a bit of luck finding stuff on google scholar. Just reading about her whiteboard and her new 'handsUp' chair that she created. Really done a lot. It's a wonder how her notability was questioned.-- FrederickJPorter ( talk) 09:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello people of Wikipedia! I have a quick question. I am trying to reference something I saw in Second Life in reference to Annabeth Robinson. How do I go about doing that? My guess is a web source but just wanted to make sure! Also, this will be needed for my new piece of written work in here so please don't delete it! Muchos gracias and I look forward to hearing from you soon Katie.lydon ( talk) 16:59, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
So I've read the notability guidelines and I have to admit that according to them, Robinson might indeed not be notable enough to be on Wikipedia. It'd be a shame to see the article go. I have wittled down the references just six. Three of which give moderate coverage of Robinson and the other three which give very little coverage.
I'm not sure whether this is enough for the article's subject to be considered notable. Obviously for me, and the people studying my course, she's incredibly notable. But wikipedia's standards are much more stringent.
So, let the discussion commence over whether she should be kept.
Also, other issues I think have been fixed, let me know what you all think on that side.
FrederickJPorter ( talk) 21:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm quite interested to know what people think about this article and the improvements made. I'm gonna put a tag here so that people will start visiting the page and I can get help deciding if I should keep this page. I really want to know whether the page will be kept or not and whether I can still improve it because it is playing on my mind that it's not properly finished. Thanks FrederickJPorter ( talk) 16:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Frederick, what do think are the two or three best reliable, independent sources that give her significant coverage? A careful reading of those sources determines whether she is notable by Wikipedia standards. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Annabeth Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)