This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ankle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Came here to find out why my foot hurt, was fed spam instead. Removing it Cosmo7 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC).
Does the "Name Derivation" section really need to be in here? Areynol2 04:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
i llike it. shows pop culture, useful and interesting
24.16.15.150
08:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think mention of cankle or thankle is appropriate for a scholarly article. 70.112.111.214 ( talk) 00:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
i have heard that ankles were considered sexy and not shown in victorian fashion. that should be listed here, maybe with a theory on why the lusted after, i figure it has something to do with the above mentioned 'cankle' 24.16.15.150 08:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, in the victorian era was ankels sexy.Håbet 05:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Depends who you ask (as with all things "sexy"). May not just be in the Victorian era... BirdbrainedPhoenix ( talk) 17:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm surprised this article is so weak. There's nothing about injury, and the movement section is very much incomplete. I hope that an expert on the subject can add some well-referenced information. -- Mikeblas 03:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
I have been unable to find any further information on the "Kiep Ankle Disorder" that is mentioned in this article (apart from on websites that have taken the content directly from here), and no references are attached to this. Does this study actually exist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.34.169.29 ( talk) 22:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
To the best of my knowledge, there is no such thing as Kiep Ankle Disorder. Not listed anywhere in my Clinical Anatomy... -- 153.19.229.72 ( talk) 23:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
The Picture has both fibula and tibula pointing to the same bone. This is confusing! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.78.102.186 ( talk) 09:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
The Achilles tendon is misspelled —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.200.168.35 ( talk) 07:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
The Achilles tendon is still misspelled in the image. It appears as anchillies. Perique des Palottes ( talk) 11:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Presumably "Anterior inferior tibiofobular ligament" should be corrected to "tibiofibular"?-- 86.172.138.32 ( talk) 07:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
In Spanish discover, named complejo ligamentoso fibulotalocalcalcáneo lateral ( University of Barcelona: Faculty of medicine and information sciences); source (journalism): El español (periódico digital) ( Pedro J. Ramírez); calendar date: 03/11/2018. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.38.233.173 ( talk) 16:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't say what the ankle bone is connected to. Why not? - Roxy the dog. wooF 16:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ankle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Came here to find out why my foot hurt, was fed spam instead. Removing it Cosmo7 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC).
Does the "Name Derivation" section really need to be in here? Areynol2 04:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
i llike it. shows pop culture, useful and interesting
24.16.15.150
08:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think mention of cankle or thankle is appropriate for a scholarly article. 70.112.111.214 ( talk) 00:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
i have heard that ankles were considered sexy and not shown in victorian fashion. that should be listed here, maybe with a theory on why the lusted after, i figure it has something to do with the above mentioned 'cankle' 24.16.15.150 08:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, in the victorian era was ankels sexy.Håbet 05:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Depends who you ask (as with all things "sexy"). May not just be in the Victorian era... BirdbrainedPhoenix ( talk) 17:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm surprised this article is so weak. There's nothing about injury, and the movement section is very much incomplete. I hope that an expert on the subject can add some well-referenced information. -- Mikeblas 03:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
I have been unable to find any further information on the "Kiep Ankle Disorder" that is mentioned in this article (apart from on websites that have taken the content directly from here), and no references are attached to this. Does this study actually exist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.34.169.29 ( talk) 22:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
To the best of my knowledge, there is no such thing as Kiep Ankle Disorder. Not listed anywhere in my Clinical Anatomy... -- 153.19.229.72 ( talk) 23:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
The Picture has both fibula and tibula pointing to the same bone. This is confusing! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.78.102.186 ( talk) 09:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
The Achilles tendon is misspelled —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.200.168.35 ( talk) 07:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
The Achilles tendon is still misspelled in the image. It appears as anchillies. Perique des Palottes ( talk) 11:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Presumably "Anterior inferior tibiofobular ligament" should be corrected to "tibiofibular"?-- 86.172.138.32 ( talk) 07:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
In Spanish discover, named complejo ligamentoso fibulotalocalcalcáneo lateral ( University of Barcelona: Faculty of medicine and information sciences); source (journalism): El español (periódico digital) ( Pedro J. Ramírez); calendar date: 03/11/2018. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.38.233.173 ( talk) 16:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't say what the ankle bone is connected to. Why not? - Roxy the dog. wooF 16:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)