![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gazifikator, NYT calls the attackers terrorists. So do US State Department, Time magazine and other sources, quoted in the article. This is a quote from this NYT article, which I have in full:
The terrorists opened their attack in the international flight terminal at Esenboga Airport, where they exploded a bomb and then strafed passengers going through passport control for a KLM flight.
The Secret Army is one of two Armenian terrorist groups that have been responsible for the assassination of 22 Turkish officials and members of their families abroad since 1973.
So what's the point in your reverting? Grand master 06:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
The rule also says:
If a reliable source describes a person or group using one of these words, then the description must be attributed in the article text to its source, preferably by direct quotation, and always with a verifiable citation. If the term is used with a clear meaning by multiple reliable independent sources, then citations to several such sources should be provided in the sentence where it appears.
I provided multiple reliable sources referring to the attackers as terrorists. Among them NYT, Time, US State Department, etc. The citations are included. We can make them more precise, if you needed. Grand master 07:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I returned the word of armed as it is sourced, neutral and correct per WP:WTA. Gazifikator ( talk) 07:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Airports are part of civil aviation. Why are you removing this category? Grand master 12:58, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Reading your link:
Each signatory country has a Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) (such as the FAA in the United States) to oversee the following areas of civil aviation:
So airports are a part of civil aviation, right? Grand master 13:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Its been decided after some talk, that this and other airport bombings or massacres are not to be put in aviation accident templates or categorized as a aviation accident or incident. If you disagree, don't revert, but instead come over to this discussion [4] and we'll listen to your opinion. ...William 20:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Esenboğa International Airport attack. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Why should Asbarez be considered a reliable non-partisan source? It is a publication by radical Armenian nationalist dashnak party or related people. The author of the article is certain Raffi Bedrosyan, civil engineer and concert pianist from Canada. [5] Why should he be trusted? Was he present at the torture? No third party source confirms the claims of torture. Claims like that require multiple reliable sources. Grand master 09:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gazifikator, NYT calls the attackers terrorists. So do US State Department, Time magazine and other sources, quoted in the article. This is a quote from this NYT article, which I have in full:
The terrorists opened their attack in the international flight terminal at Esenboga Airport, where they exploded a bomb and then strafed passengers going through passport control for a KLM flight.
The Secret Army is one of two Armenian terrorist groups that have been responsible for the assassination of 22 Turkish officials and members of their families abroad since 1973.
So what's the point in your reverting? Grand master 06:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
The rule also says:
If a reliable source describes a person or group using one of these words, then the description must be attributed in the article text to its source, preferably by direct quotation, and always with a verifiable citation. If the term is used with a clear meaning by multiple reliable independent sources, then citations to several such sources should be provided in the sentence where it appears.
I provided multiple reliable sources referring to the attackers as terrorists. Among them NYT, Time, US State Department, etc. The citations are included. We can make them more precise, if you needed. Grand master 07:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I returned the word of armed as it is sourced, neutral and correct per WP:WTA. Gazifikator ( talk) 07:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Airports are part of civil aviation. Why are you removing this category? Grand master 12:58, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Reading your link:
Each signatory country has a Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) (such as the FAA in the United States) to oversee the following areas of civil aviation:
So airports are a part of civil aviation, right? Grand master 13:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Its been decided after some talk, that this and other airport bombings or massacres are not to be put in aviation accident templates or categorized as a aviation accident or incident. If you disagree, don't revert, but instead come over to this discussion [4] and we'll listen to your opinion. ...William 20:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Esenboğa International Airport attack. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Why should Asbarez be considered a reliable non-partisan source? It is a publication by radical Armenian nationalist dashnak party or related people. The author of the article is certain Raffi Bedrosyan, civil engineer and concert pianist from Canada. [5] Why should he be trusted? Was he present at the torture? No third party source confirms the claims of torture. Claims like that require multiple reliable sources. Grand master 09:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)