Animal echolocation has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 17, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): OLRCL.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 14:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Should we not add humans to the list of organisms that can echolocate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.11.187.161 ( talk) 12:48, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Molecular, anatomical & behavioral evidence for soft-furred tree mice using echolocation.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6548/eaay1513 Fitzhugh ( talk) 18:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
This section needs a substantial description of the ground-breaking research of Kenneth Roeder of Tufts University in the 1960s & 70s on noctuid moths, which, based on two bilateral pairs of neurons, can turn away from a distant echolocating bat, and when the sound gets intense, will stop flying and drop to the ground. A classic study in neuroethology (I do not have time to go into the proper detail and Wikipedia formatting on this, unfortunately). See for example https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.154.3756.1515 Dragonfly360 ( talk) 02:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
The article's currently suffering from some over-citation in areas. Consider either WP:CITEONE or WP:CITEMERGE for solutions. -- Primium ( talk) 04:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Primium ( talk · contribs) 16:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Looks pretty good, just a couple points I've noticed so far:
I'll come back in a bit to continue looking over the article. -- Primium ( talk) 16:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Appear to be in good order. Links are accessible.
I asked above if you're sure basicbiology.net is a reliable source (ref 38). I'll trust your judgement. This is the only remaining item.
Great work! It looks excellent (especially the whales section - so much easier to read). I'll update the talk page and mark it GA. -- Primium ( talk) 19:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Animal echolocation has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 17, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): OLRCL.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 14:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Should we not add humans to the list of organisms that can echolocate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.11.187.161 ( talk) 12:48, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Molecular, anatomical & behavioral evidence for soft-furred tree mice using echolocation.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6548/eaay1513 Fitzhugh ( talk) 18:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
This section needs a substantial description of the ground-breaking research of Kenneth Roeder of Tufts University in the 1960s & 70s on noctuid moths, which, based on two bilateral pairs of neurons, can turn away from a distant echolocating bat, and when the sound gets intense, will stop flying and drop to the ground. A classic study in neuroethology (I do not have time to go into the proper detail and Wikipedia formatting on this, unfortunately). See for example https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.154.3756.1515 Dragonfly360 ( talk) 02:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
The article's currently suffering from some over-citation in areas. Consider either WP:CITEONE or WP:CITEMERGE for solutions. -- Primium ( talk) 04:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Primium ( talk · contribs) 16:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Looks pretty good, just a couple points I've noticed so far:
I'll come back in a bit to continue looking over the article. -- Primium ( talk) 16:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Appear to be in good order. Links are accessible.
I asked above if you're sure basicbiology.net is a reliable source (ref 38). I'll trust your judgement. This is the only remaining item.
Great work! It looks excellent (especially the whales section - so much easier to read). I'll update the talk page and mark it GA. -- Primium ( talk) 19:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)