This article was nominated for deletion on 16 September 2008. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophical literature

Unless there is specific information that individual vols in this series are particularly notable, I would oppose individual listings for them. Holdings are irrelevant, as most academic libraries subscribe to the whole set. It's like individual periodical issues. I'm not going to renom, but I would have opposed if i had seen it in time. DGG ( talk) 03:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC) reply