This article was nominated for deletion on 31 December 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Isn't at least some of this stuff supposed to have been Chaff (radar countermeasure)? - Logotu 22:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
chaff causes "space grass" Condon report "2. Material Allegedly Deposited by UFOs", pages 131-133. Not sure this is also called "angel hair" by other sources, or if they two clearly distinguishable things. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 01:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted the vandalism from User:DreamGuy. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 19:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
one of the sources talks about ionizaton of heavy atoms [7], and I added that it was caused by a "G-field" (and not by natural phenomena). The source mentions it at several places [8], but I'm not sure if I should leave it as a redlink or point it to "gravity field". Would that be correct? -- Enric Naval ( talk) 22:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Stating here, as I did in the edit summary for the redirect. The AFD ended in "no consensus", but consensus was clear to redirect the Angel hair page to the type of pasta commonly referred to by that name. I have completed the edit of the redirect. CaveatLector Talk Contrib 07:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I find it very pedantic and insulting to claim (in the first few words of the article nonetheless) that "angel hair" is mythical. I find it particularly offensive sense I happen to know for a fact that it does exist. I once held some in my hand for about half a second before it evaporated.-- 208.63.102.196 ( talk) 19:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
does it really need to be stated in the opening paragraph that angel hair is important in Raëlism? seems more like something that would go in a trivia section were they not frowned upon. imho that opening paragraph should help explain the subject, not bring up useless factoids. 99.153.29.112 ( talk) 19:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
I have no idea how to edit this, but I ended up at this page after reading http://theunexplainedmysteries.com/unexplained-fall.html which is pretty much a copy and paste of the third source or reference, http://english.pravda.ru/science/mysteries/30-05-2007/92473-angel_hair-0/
This article claims "On February 10, 1978, a large number of sticky fibers were falling from the sky for two hours in the vicinity of the coastal city of Samaru, New Zealand. The fibers appeared to be “considerably finer than cobwebs” yet clearly visible against a clear blue sky."
I'll believe the entire article (the one used as a reference) isn't totally fabricated if anyone can show me where Samaru, New Zealand is. Google maps doesn't appear to know, and I sure as sheep have never heard of it, and I grew up travelling around New Zealand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.54.87.66 ( talk) 16:33, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Years ago I saw a BW TV episode of some Twilight Zone style anthology series that involved angel hair and a disappearance. Investigators found the stuff all over a site and at the end of the episode one of the investigators is alone at the site, looks up and cries out in fear.
Anyone know the series that is from as it is one of the few appearances of the stuff on a TV show. Omega2064 ( talk) 10:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The images of living things found in the hair of an angel can be seen on Google in "2 de Novembro de 1959 imagens" is not necessary to speculate about things already documented and investigated. The source of the images is a teacher with unquestionable credibility.It's a good idea to put the images and take the spider mention,that is not a spider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.137.238.109 ( talk) 21:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 31 December 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Isn't at least some of this stuff supposed to have been Chaff (radar countermeasure)? - Logotu 22:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
chaff causes "space grass" Condon report "2. Material Allegedly Deposited by UFOs", pages 131-133. Not sure this is also called "angel hair" by other sources, or if they two clearly distinguishable things. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 01:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted the vandalism from User:DreamGuy. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 19:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
one of the sources talks about ionizaton of heavy atoms [7], and I added that it was caused by a "G-field" (and not by natural phenomena). The source mentions it at several places [8], but I'm not sure if I should leave it as a redlink or point it to "gravity field". Would that be correct? -- Enric Naval ( talk) 22:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Stating here, as I did in the edit summary for the redirect. The AFD ended in "no consensus", but consensus was clear to redirect the Angel hair page to the type of pasta commonly referred to by that name. I have completed the edit of the redirect. CaveatLector Talk Contrib 07:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
I find it very pedantic and insulting to claim (in the first few words of the article nonetheless) that "angel hair" is mythical. I find it particularly offensive sense I happen to know for a fact that it does exist. I once held some in my hand for about half a second before it evaporated.-- 208.63.102.196 ( talk) 19:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
does it really need to be stated in the opening paragraph that angel hair is important in Raëlism? seems more like something that would go in a trivia section were they not frowned upon. imho that opening paragraph should help explain the subject, not bring up useless factoids. 99.153.29.112 ( talk) 19:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
I have no idea how to edit this, but I ended up at this page after reading http://theunexplainedmysteries.com/unexplained-fall.html which is pretty much a copy and paste of the third source or reference, http://english.pravda.ru/science/mysteries/30-05-2007/92473-angel_hair-0/
This article claims "On February 10, 1978, a large number of sticky fibers were falling from the sky for two hours in the vicinity of the coastal city of Samaru, New Zealand. The fibers appeared to be “considerably finer than cobwebs” yet clearly visible against a clear blue sky."
I'll believe the entire article (the one used as a reference) isn't totally fabricated if anyone can show me where Samaru, New Zealand is. Google maps doesn't appear to know, and I sure as sheep have never heard of it, and I grew up travelling around New Zealand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.54.87.66 ( talk) 16:33, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Years ago I saw a BW TV episode of some Twilight Zone style anthology series that involved angel hair and a disappearance. Investigators found the stuff all over a site and at the end of the episode one of the investigators is alone at the site, looks up and cries out in fear.
Anyone know the series that is from as it is one of the few appearances of the stuff on a TV show. Omega2064 ( talk) 10:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The images of living things found in the hair of an angel can be seen on Google in "2 de Novembro de 1959 imagens" is not necessary to speculate about things already documented and investigated. The source of the images is a teacher with unquestionable credibility.It's a good idea to put the images and take the spider mention,that is not a spider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.137.238.109 ( talk) 21:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)