This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Andre Marrou article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Okay, I'm still not sure exactly why you consider this to be condescending, but I'm at least starting to understand what part of this bothers you. First of all, I want to assure you that in no way did I intend this to be condescending. Far from it. I have a great deal of respect for Libertarians in general, and Mr. Marrou specifically. I had the honor of holding an extended conversation in person with him during his Presidential run. We reminisced a bit about Alaska (both of us had lived in that state during the 1980s) and discussed the realistic prospects for the Libertarian movement, and I pledged my vote to him in person, though I also told him that I was willing to do so that year only because I was so disenchanted with both the GOP and Dem candidates (our conversation took place in September, when Ross Perot was still on his "leave" from his run). Anyway, no slight or condescension was intended.
The verbiage to which you have taken such exception originated with this edit, by myself. I thought that the modifier, "to a state legislature", downplayed the importance of Marrou's election. I mean, very few Libertarians have been able to break through the two-party ceiling, anywhere in the US, for any office. Yes, he was one of the few Libertarians elected to a state legislature. But how many Libertarians have been elected to Congress, mayorships, governorships, county boards, city councils, etc? Very few. To point out that he was one of the few elected to a state legislature—without the bigger picture—diminishes (IMHO) the significance of his accomplishment.
Anyway, I have no objection to the current wording. In fact, strictly speaking, it's probably gramatically superior to mine, since the "any" should be inferred from the lack of another modifier. So leave it as it is, but please do understand that no disparagement was intended. Unschool ( talk) 04:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Andre Marrou article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Okay, I'm still not sure exactly why you consider this to be condescending, but I'm at least starting to understand what part of this bothers you. First of all, I want to assure you that in no way did I intend this to be condescending. Far from it. I have a great deal of respect for Libertarians in general, and Mr. Marrou specifically. I had the honor of holding an extended conversation in person with him during his Presidential run. We reminisced a bit about Alaska (both of us had lived in that state during the 1980s) and discussed the realistic prospects for the Libertarian movement, and I pledged my vote to him in person, though I also told him that I was willing to do so that year only because I was so disenchanted with both the GOP and Dem candidates (our conversation took place in September, when Ross Perot was still on his "leave" from his run). Anyway, no slight or condescension was intended.
The verbiage to which you have taken such exception originated with this edit, by myself. I thought that the modifier, "to a state legislature", downplayed the importance of Marrou's election. I mean, very few Libertarians have been able to break through the two-party ceiling, anywhere in the US, for any office. Yes, he was one of the few Libertarians elected to a state legislature. But how many Libertarians have been elected to Congress, mayorships, governorships, county boards, city councils, etc? Very few. To point out that he was one of the few elected to a state legislature—without the bigger picture—diminishes (IMHO) the significance of his accomplishment.
Anyway, I have no objection to the current wording. In fact, strictly speaking, it's probably gramatically superior to mine, since the "any" should be inferred from the lack of another modifier. So leave it as it is, but please do understand that no disparagement was intended. Unschool ( talk) 04:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)