In contemporary music articles, if a song/album charts, you expect to see a "Charts" section. Look at other singles articles to get an idea. You can use a regular table, or you can use
Template:Singlechart.
The release note citations are questionable. It would be nice to have a source that is easily viewable. Your source for the chart peak has a different date than the one stated on the article (source says March 25, 2006). Fix it.
Pass. Even if it would be nice, at the end of the day, it is sourced with catalog number. I Help, When I Can.[12]00:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The first paragraph in the "Background" section focuses a little too much on the remix album, and not the song itself. I would like to see more opinions taken into account in the "Reception" section.
It's not actually. It seems to focuse more on the remix album because were talking about how the song was released, along with the album. -
Sauloviegas (
talk)
21:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)reply
"On September 28, 2005, Jive Records announced through a press release that Spears would release a remix album titled Remixed. However, on November 8, 2005, it was reported by Jennifer Vineyard of MTV that the album was actually titled B in the Mix: The Remixes, and was going to be released on November 22, 2005." Explain to me how these two sentances relate to the song. I Help, When I Can.[12]00:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
The new first two sentences could fit into the "Composition" section. Try to make something appealing and informative in the "Background". Something about the history of it's creation, not just the facts on who did this/who did that. I feel like an asshole, but I gotta critique you on that. I Help, When I Can.[12]23:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC)reply
No problem, I'll do it. :) -
187.48.168.219 (
talk) 02:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC
Hey, I've searched google up and down, and didn't find any more info about the song. I know that it would be much better if the producer (Mark Taylor) had given some interview about the song or even Britney herself talked about it, but there is nothing... Sorry... -
Sauloviegas (
talk)
21:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Ok. Despite the article not having the "beef", it has the taste. Pass.
I would see if I could find any more information on the article (just sayin'). Besides how skinny it is, fix these factors and I will re-evaluate. It is now officially on hold.It does not have quantity, but it has quality, a more important aspect.
In contemporary music articles, if a song/album charts, you expect to see a "Charts" section. Look at other singles articles to get an idea. You can use a regular table, or you can use
Template:Singlechart.
The release note citations are questionable. It would be nice to have a source that is easily viewable. Your source for the chart peak has a different date than the one stated on the article (source says March 25, 2006). Fix it.
Pass. Even if it would be nice, at the end of the day, it is sourced with catalog number. I Help, When I Can.[12]00:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The first paragraph in the "Background" section focuses a little too much on the remix album, and not the song itself. I would like to see more opinions taken into account in the "Reception" section.
It's not actually. It seems to focuse more on the remix album because were talking about how the song was released, along with the album. -
Sauloviegas (
talk)
21:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)reply
"On September 28, 2005, Jive Records announced through a press release that Spears would release a remix album titled Remixed. However, on November 8, 2005, it was reported by Jennifer Vineyard of MTV that the album was actually titled B in the Mix: The Remixes, and was going to be released on November 22, 2005." Explain to me how these two sentances relate to the song. I Help, When I Can.[12]00:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)reply
The new first two sentences could fit into the "Composition" section. Try to make something appealing and informative in the "Background". Something about the history of it's creation, not just the facts on who did this/who did that. I feel like an asshole, but I gotta critique you on that. I Help, When I Can.[12]23:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC)reply
No problem, I'll do it. :) -
187.48.168.219 (
talk) 02:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC
Hey, I've searched google up and down, and didn't find any more info about the song. I know that it would be much better if the producer (Mark Taylor) had given some interview about the song or even Britney herself talked about it, but there is nothing... Sorry... -
Sauloviegas (
talk)
21:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Ok. Despite the article not having the "beef", it has the taste. Pass.
I would see if I could find any more information on the article (just sayin'). Besides how skinny it is, fix these factors and I will re-evaluate. It is now officially on hold.It does not have quantity, but it has quality, a more important aspect.