This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
See [ [1]], explain before re-inserting why this is RS. Slatersteven ( talk) 18:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Many of the sources used in this article such as Lankadeep, The Daily Mirror, Dinamina and such are not WP:RS. The article has very few academic sources. Better sources needed. I also think the name section should rather be moved to Kantharodai, with better sources. Xenani ( talk) 19:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I will remove the name section because it is now mentioned in the Kandarodai article under the Etymology section, as the name section is not related to the actual Vihara but more to the place name. Xenani ( talk) 15:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
L Manju, I think it is better to mention it in the History section though as it is a historic reference. It is already mentioned in the Kandarodai etymology section Xenani ( talk) 22:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
There is no reliable scholarly sources to indicate, it’s “Kadurugoda Viharaya”. Kadurugoda is the Sinhala version of the Kandarodai. Since the history section shows multiple theories for the origin of the Vihara. Even Tamil Buddhism was extant in this area. I am reverting to “Kandarodai Vihara”. Shivaass ( talk) 04:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
There is no Vihara but only Stupas are there. We can connect the Stupas to ancient Vihara which was extant there in the content of the article but it is misleading to name it as Vihara on the title of the article. Shivaass ( talk) 05:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
See [ [1]], explain before re-inserting why this is RS. Slatersteven ( talk) 18:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Many of the sources used in this article such as Lankadeep, The Daily Mirror, Dinamina and such are not WP:RS. The article has very few academic sources. Better sources needed. I also think the name section should rather be moved to Kantharodai, with better sources. Xenani ( talk) 19:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I will remove the name section because it is now mentioned in the Kandarodai article under the Etymology section, as the name section is not related to the actual Vihara but more to the place name. Xenani ( talk) 15:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
L Manju, I think it is better to mention it in the History section though as it is a historic reference. It is already mentioned in the Kandarodai etymology section Xenani ( talk) 22:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
There is no reliable scholarly sources to indicate, it’s “Kadurugoda Viharaya”. Kadurugoda is the Sinhala version of the Kandarodai. Since the history section shows multiple theories for the origin of the Vihara. Even Tamil Buddhism was extant in this area. I am reverting to “Kandarodai Vihara”. Shivaass ( talk) 04:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
There is no Vihara but only Stupas are there. We can connect the Stupas to ancient Vihara which was extant there in the content of the article but it is misleading to name it as Vihara on the title of the article. Shivaass ( talk) 05:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)