This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should probably be similar to Northern Mali conflict in convention, considering both describe the sections of the countries the conflict is occurring in. There is no evidence this conflict is occurring anywhere else in Iraq than Anbar at this point. -- Kuzwa ( talk) 17:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
There is no consensus to change the name back to anbar conflict, rather indeed multiple editors have taken action in opposition to that name. XavierGreen ( talk) 19:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Okay. The simple fact is, is that it's spillover from the Syria war. The AQ's been running amuck in Western Anbar for the better part of a year, and they've got a large swath of land from Central Syria to Fallujah, and nearly ten thousand civilians have been killed since the start of 2013. This is NOT something new, it's a battle in a war that's been going on for a while. Ericl ( talk) 21:26, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
The Iraq insurgency article uses ISIL while this uses ISIS, which is it? -- Kuzwa ( talk) 14:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/01/iraq-fallujah-al-qaeda-20141702218689268.html http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestory/2014/01/al-qaeda-testing-loyalties-iraq-20141692210911233.html http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/01/isil-calls-iraq-sunnis-keep-fighting-2014186554213170.html http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/01/iraqi-forces-bomb-east-fallujah-20141518832201807.html >> Deal struck to drive out fighters in Iraq >> fallujah pact in the making to keep army out >> Iraq army assault under way to eject al-Qaeda >> Iraqi PM calls for world's help amid violence >> US agrees to send new arms, artillery to Iraq to fight Al Qaeda >> Iraqi army launches major assault on Ramadi >> Iraqi army launches major assault on Ramadi >> Dozens killed in string of Baghdad bombings >> UN says 140,000 fled violence in Iraq's Anbar > Explainer: Iraq and the ISIL >> Osama al-Nujaifi: 'We want an Iraqi solution' >> Iraq's PM promises perks to Sunni allies *]\p[ >> Iraq announces 72-hour truce in Fallujah >> EXCLUSIVE-Iraq signs deal to buy arms, ammunition from Iran - documents >> US delivers 100 Hellfire missiles to Iraq >> Scores killed in clashes in Iraq's Ramadi >> Violence surges in Iraq's Anbar province( Lihaas ( talk) 11:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)).
Iraqi security forces backed by tribal fighters regained control in the centre of Anbar's provincial capital Ramadi on Monday, another special forces officer said. Clashes continued in the surrounding areas on Tuesday, he added. In the city centre, government offices, hospitals and markets reopened. Reuters Daily Independent 4 News Hanibal911 ( talk) 12:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Speaking in his weekly televised address on Wednesday, Maliki also pledged to continue the "sacred war" against al-Qaeda's local branch - the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) - and finish the push to retake Fallujah and Ramadi. "I call on those who were lured to be part of the terrorism machine led by al-Qaeda to return to reason," he said. In return, he promised that his government will "open a new page to settle their cases so that they won't be fuel for the war that is led by al-Qaeda". http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/01/iraq-forges-new-strategy-defeat-fighters-201418142439592864.html -- 93.137.132.242 ( talk) 15:40, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Refs 13 and 14 should be broken out either in the infobox or as a note. But the breaking out in the references throws everthing out of whack.( Lihaas ( talk) 07:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)).
From 2 divisions sent in action, 18000 men either died or deserted ? what exactly is left there to put up a fight ???? TheMightyGeneral ( talk) 05:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
IraqiNews.com is not a reliable source since it is extremely pro-government and even a part of Iraq's propaganda system. If anyone has any news from this site, additional referrences should be included before adding the news. For example, this site has said that the Iraqi army and security forces have opended Fallujah dam gates while the ISIS and rebels opened it as the water has been overwhelemd.
FutureTrillionaire quite rightly pointed out there were a number of problems with the map with certain areas being shown as being under full opposition control when in actuality their situation was more ambiguous. In order to resolve this, and also after going through several of the original sources cited, I've changed a number of them to contested. Khalidya has been changed to govt control, as the Elaph source cited by ISW states that government forces retook it (alongside Hit). Are there any other issues people can currently see with it? MrPenguin20 ( talk) 15:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) Calidum Talk To Me 04:41, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Anbar clashes (2013–14) →
ISIL insurgency in Iraq – Recently ISIL militants succesfully managed to fully overrun the second largest city in Iraq.
[1] Cities such as Shirqat and Samarra in Salaheddin are also under attack. I think a title like
ISIL insurgency in Iraq would make more sense now. Relisted.
Jenks24 (
talk) 09:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC) --
Kathovo
talk
11:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Anbar clashes (2013–14) → Mosul offensive – Currently the content on the actual attack is very short for its own page. Aas such, I think it could be better placed as a subsection of this as the background is primarily discussing this page. Lihaas ( talk) 12:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I don't understand why the capture of Mosul is included in this article. It isn't even in Anbar province. B14709 ( talk) 16:06, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Can we get a source for the involvement of the Rashidin Army? 130.64.98.86 ( talk) 14:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Anbar campaign (2013–14). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
There is a discussion taking place here that might effect this page. Charles Essie ( talk) 03:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anbar campaign (2013–14). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
After numerous discussions and consensus to create one, an umbrella article for the entire Iraq conflict (2003–present) has finally been created. However, it needs a great deal of work and I am seeking help in expanding it. Charles Essie ( talk) 19:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should probably be similar to Northern Mali conflict in convention, considering both describe the sections of the countries the conflict is occurring in. There is no evidence this conflict is occurring anywhere else in Iraq than Anbar at this point. -- Kuzwa ( talk) 17:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
There is no consensus to change the name back to anbar conflict, rather indeed multiple editors have taken action in opposition to that name. XavierGreen ( talk) 19:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Okay. The simple fact is, is that it's spillover from the Syria war. The AQ's been running amuck in Western Anbar for the better part of a year, and they've got a large swath of land from Central Syria to Fallujah, and nearly ten thousand civilians have been killed since the start of 2013. This is NOT something new, it's a battle in a war that's been going on for a while. Ericl ( talk) 21:26, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
The Iraq insurgency article uses ISIL while this uses ISIS, which is it? -- Kuzwa ( talk) 14:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/01/iraq-fallujah-al-qaeda-20141702218689268.html http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestory/2014/01/al-qaeda-testing-loyalties-iraq-20141692210911233.html http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/01/isil-calls-iraq-sunnis-keep-fighting-2014186554213170.html http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/01/iraqi-forces-bomb-east-fallujah-20141518832201807.html >> Deal struck to drive out fighters in Iraq >> fallujah pact in the making to keep army out >> Iraq army assault under way to eject al-Qaeda >> Iraqi PM calls for world's help amid violence >> US agrees to send new arms, artillery to Iraq to fight Al Qaeda >> Iraqi army launches major assault on Ramadi >> Iraqi army launches major assault on Ramadi >> Dozens killed in string of Baghdad bombings >> UN says 140,000 fled violence in Iraq's Anbar > Explainer: Iraq and the ISIL >> Osama al-Nujaifi: 'We want an Iraqi solution' >> Iraq's PM promises perks to Sunni allies *]\p[ >> Iraq announces 72-hour truce in Fallujah >> EXCLUSIVE-Iraq signs deal to buy arms, ammunition from Iran - documents >> US delivers 100 Hellfire missiles to Iraq >> Scores killed in clashes in Iraq's Ramadi >> Violence surges in Iraq's Anbar province( Lihaas ( talk) 11:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)).
Iraqi security forces backed by tribal fighters regained control in the centre of Anbar's provincial capital Ramadi on Monday, another special forces officer said. Clashes continued in the surrounding areas on Tuesday, he added. In the city centre, government offices, hospitals and markets reopened. Reuters Daily Independent 4 News Hanibal911 ( talk) 12:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Speaking in his weekly televised address on Wednesday, Maliki also pledged to continue the "sacred war" against al-Qaeda's local branch - the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) - and finish the push to retake Fallujah and Ramadi. "I call on those who were lured to be part of the terrorism machine led by al-Qaeda to return to reason," he said. In return, he promised that his government will "open a new page to settle their cases so that they won't be fuel for the war that is led by al-Qaeda". http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/01/iraq-forges-new-strategy-defeat-fighters-201418142439592864.html -- 93.137.132.242 ( talk) 15:40, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Refs 13 and 14 should be broken out either in the infobox or as a note. But the breaking out in the references throws everthing out of whack.( Lihaas ( talk) 07:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)).
From 2 divisions sent in action, 18000 men either died or deserted ? what exactly is left there to put up a fight ???? TheMightyGeneral ( talk) 05:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
IraqiNews.com is not a reliable source since it is extremely pro-government and even a part of Iraq's propaganda system. If anyone has any news from this site, additional referrences should be included before adding the news. For example, this site has said that the Iraqi army and security forces have opended Fallujah dam gates while the ISIS and rebels opened it as the water has been overwhelemd.
FutureTrillionaire quite rightly pointed out there were a number of problems with the map with certain areas being shown as being under full opposition control when in actuality their situation was more ambiguous. In order to resolve this, and also after going through several of the original sources cited, I've changed a number of them to contested. Khalidya has been changed to govt control, as the Elaph source cited by ISW states that government forces retook it (alongside Hit). Are there any other issues people can currently see with it? MrPenguin20 ( talk) 15:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) Calidum Talk To Me 04:41, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Anbar clashes (2013–14) →
ISIL insurgency in Iraq – Recently ISIL militants succesfully managed to fully overrun the second largest city in Iraq.
[1] Cities such as Shirqat and Samarra in Salaheddin are also under attack. I think a title like
ISIL insurgency in Iraq would make more sense now. Relisted.
Jenks24 (
talk) 09:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC) --
Kathovo
talk
11:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Anbar clashes (2013–14) → Mosul offensive – Currently the content on the actual attack is very short for its own page. Aas such, I think it could be better placed as a subsection of this as the background is primarily discussing this page. Lihaas ( talk) 12:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I don't understand why the capture of Mosul is included in this article. It isn't even in Anbar province. B14709 ( talk) 16:06, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Can we get a source for the involvement of the Rashidin Army? 130.64.98.86 ( talk) 14:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Anbar campaign (2013–14). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
There is a discussion taking place here that might effect this page. Charles Essie ( talk) 03:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anbar campaign (2013–14). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
After numerous discussions and consensus to create one, an umbrella article for the entire Iraq conflict (2003–present) has finally been created. However, it needs a great deal of work and I am seeking help in expanding it. Charles Essie ( talk) 19:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)