GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Amitchell125 ( talk · contribs) 18:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Happy to review the article.
Hi Footlessmouse, I'm concerned about the amount text in the article devoted to the book's numerous reviews (about half the article's text), in comparison with the discussion of the book itself (about a third). I think the reviews section would benefit from being trimmed back a bit, with more information provided about the book's historical context, style, and what existed for physicists and mathematicians before its publication. What do you think? Amitchell125 ( talk) 19:15, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
As the article is some way off from being GA, according to criteria 1 and 3, I am failing it. Amitchell125 ( talk) 15:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Amitchell125 ( talk · contribs) 18:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Happy to review the article.
Hi Footlessmouse, I'm concerned about the amount text in the article devoted to the book's numerous reviews (about half the article's text), in comparison with the discussion of the book itself (about a third). I think the reviews section would benefit from being trimmed back a bit, with more information provided about the book's historical context, style, and what existed for physicists and mathematicians before its publication. What do you think? Amitchell125 ( talk) 19:15, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
As the article is some way off from being GA, according to criteria 1 and 3, I am failing it. Amitchell125 ( talk) 15:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)