This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Statistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

I have improved the page so it better describes the software, with links to other articles in Wikipedia, and have formatted the page similar to other pages describing software products.

I have also included independent published references and comparison of the software to show it's widespread use in the area. This, I believe, qualifies my assertion that the software is notable and is certainly as notable as other software included in Wikipedia, such as Unistat, Medcalc etc..

Comments? Jickh 09:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC) reply

I have taken the hang-on/speedy delete tag off. This is the recreation of an AfDed page but since the AfD enough additional material has been added on notability to mean that I think the discussion needs to happen again (without in any way prejudging the outcome) -- BozMo talk 11:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC) reply