![]() | Anahim hotspot has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Volcanoes, from June 18 through July 20 2008, a project to systematically present information on volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information), or join by visiting the project page. | This article was a Collaboration of the Month of
I'm not much of a rating guy, but can anybody with more background comment on whether Good article status is within reach for this article? What would need to be added/fixed to make it a good candidate? Black Tusk 01:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
This article really doesn't need much for either FA or GA:
Really a good article. Meldshal42 Hit me What I've Done 20:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I think I'm going to nominate this article for GA status. Its really quite good. ~ Meldshal42 Hit me What I've Done 20:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Could someone please review the article? ~ Me ldshal 42 17:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
This review is transcluded from Talk:Anahim hotspot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Quite a bit work left to do on this article yet I think; in particular the referencing needs to be tightened up. Here are my detailed observations:
reworded. ~ Me ldshal 42 20:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm putting this article on hold, to allow time for these issues to be addressed. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 18:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Too may indents, so I'll start back on the left side. I don't think we can conclude that the "Internet Fly Fishing Magazine" is a reliable source just because it is correct. Perhaps the book you mention might be a better source to use than the currently cited web page? -- Burntnickel ( talk) 21:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
No theory is close to airtight.
Ireally think its a minro thing that doesn't really matter at the moment. ~ Me ldshal 42 20:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Is this source reliable? It looks to me like a student project. Epbr123 ( talk) 20:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to close this GA nomination now. I really think the editors have done a fantastic job over the last week or so, and that they're all to be congratulated on what they've achieved. The referencing has improved out of all recognition, there's now a proper lead ... I could wax on and on, but the bottom line is that I think this is now a pretty fine article, and I'm going to list it as a GA. Congratulations! -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 21:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Anahim hotspot. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
We are not going to go around and add WP:Earthquakes to all articles that we have that are known "earthquake zones". That would literally mean adding hundreds of articles under the WP:Earthquakes umbrella. I don't think we want that. WP:Geology and WP:Vocanoes are fine for this one. Dawnseeker2000
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Anahim hotspot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anahim hotspot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Anahim hotspot has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Volcanoes, from June 18 through July 20 2008, a project to systematically present information on volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information), or join by visiting the project page. | This article was a Collaboration of the Month of
I'm not much of a rating guy, but can anybody with more background comment on whether Good article status is within reach for this article? What would need to be added/fixed to make it a good candidate? Black Tusk 01:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
This article really doesn't need much for either FA or GA:
Really a good article. Meldshal42 Hit me What I've Done 20:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
I think I'm going to nominate this article for GA status. Its really quite good. ~ Meldshal42 Hit me What I've Done 20:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Could someone please review the article? ~ Me ldshal 42 17:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
This review is transcluded from Talk:Anahim hotspot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Quite a bit work left to do on this article yet I think; in particular the referencing needs to be tightened up. Here are my detailed observations:
reworded. ~ Me ldshal 42 20:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm putting this article on hold, to allow time for these issues to be addressed. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 18:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Too may indents, so I'll start back on the left side. I don't think we can conclude that the "Internet Fly Fishing Magazine" is a reliable source just because it is correct. Perhaps the book you mention might be a better source to use than the currently cited web page? -- Burntnickel ( talk) 21:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
No theory is close to airtight.
Ireally think its a minro thing that doesn't really matter at the moment. ~ Me ldshal 42 20:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Is this source reliable? It looks to me like a student project. Epbr123 ( talk) 20:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to close this GA nomination now. I really think the editors have done a fantastic job over the last week or so, and that they're all to be congratulated on what they've achieved. The referencing has improved out of all recognition, there's now a proper lead ... I could wax on and on, but the bottom line is that I think this is now a pretty fine article, and I'm going to list it as a GA. Congratulations! -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 21:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Anahim hotspot. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
We are not going to go around and add WP:Earthquakes to all articles that we have that are known "earthquake zones". That would literally mean adding hundreds of articles under the WP:Earthquakes umbrella. I don't think we want that. WP:Geology and WP:Vocanoes are fine for this one. Dawnseeker2000
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Anahim hotspot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anahim hotspot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)