This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose merging Amur Annexation into Treaty of Beijing. I think the content in Amur Annexation can easily be explained in the context of Treaty of Beijing, and the terminology 'Amur Annexation' is not a common academic term. Geographyinitiative ( talk) 17:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
I think "Amur Annexation" is the more common name. For example, according to Google Search "Amur Annexation" returns 8100 results [1], whereas "Amur annexations" only returns 366 results [2]. -- Wengier ( talk) 06:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
So, while formatting the bibliography, I realized that Russian expansion on the Amur, 1848–1860: the push to the Pacific. was published by Edwin Mellen Press, and Wikipedia actually helpfully shouted at me that it's essentially a vanity press. Does anyone have a copy, or know with more certainty whether we should use this source? I'd also appreciate more sources for the "aftermath" period in general. Remsense 聊 12:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose merging Amur Annexation into Treaty of Beijing. I think the content in Amur Annexation can easily be explained in the context of Treaty of Beijing, and the terminology 'Amur Annexation' is not a common academic term. Geographyinitiative ( talk) 17:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
I think "Amur Annexation" is the more common name. For example, according to Google Search "Amur Annexation" returns 8100 results [1], whereas "Amur annexations" only returns 366 results [2]. -- Wengier ( talk) 06:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
So, while formatting the bibliography, I realized that Russian expansion on the Amur, 1848–1860: the push to the Pacific. was published by Edwin Mellen Press, and Wikipedia actually helpfully shouted at me that it's essentially a vanity press. Does anyone have a copy, or know with more certainty whether we should use this source? I'd also appreciate more sources for the "aftermath" period in general. Remsense 聊 12:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)