This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ammonoosuc River article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph of the river along its lower reaches be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in New Hampshire may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The page cited is not alone sufficient to support the claim that the Ammy has been called "Upper Amonoosuck River", or called "Wild Amonoosuck River": their mention as "variants" may be construed to mean simply that those names are related to the name in question, especially since it is likely that they refer, respectively, to the completely separate
Upper Ammonoosuc River and to the Ammy's tributary the
Wild Ammonoosuc River. I.e., construing their names as names for the Ammy is most plausibly a mistake of either our editor or the board. Likewise, if it were the case that one writer each whom the board uncovered mistakenly attached those names to the Ammy, "has also been known as" would be literally true, but not the kind of generally accepted knowledge we are to provide. The at best confusing, and probably confused, info is unsuitable.
--
Jerzy•
t 19:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ammonoosuc River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ammonoosuc River article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph of the river along its lower reaches be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in New Hampshire may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The page cited is not alone sufficient to support the claim that the Ammy has been called "Upper Amonoosuck River", or called "Wild Amonoosuck River": their mention as "variants" may be construed to mean simply that those names are related to the name in question, especially since it is likely that they refer, respectively, to the completely separate
Upper Ammonoosuc River and to the Ammy's tributary the
Wild Ammonoosuc River. I.e., construing their names as names for the Ammy is most plausibly a mistake of either our editor or the board. Likewise, if it were the case that one writer each whom the board uncovered mistakenly attached those names to the Ammy, "has also been known as" would be literally true, but not the kind of generally accepted knowledge we are to provide. The at best confusing, and probably confused, info is unsuitable.
--
Jerzy•
t 19:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ammonoosuc River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)